“Closed for review” improvement suggestions

[punchdrunk]

It seems that the “Closed for review” threads are often ones in which various Talkbassers have invested some opinion, and are often left unresolved.
It would be exceedingly interesting, as well as transparent of the administration, if they would consider posting an itemized list of actions taken at the bottom of a closed thread (ie, “Gave Punchdrunk a warning for trolling”, “Edited potentially harmful language from post #31”, etc)
I think it would certainly go a long way in allaying certain suspicions of bias and inaction among the administration in the eyes of the community, and may also have the adding bonus of serving as a behavioral detriment.
Thoughts?

 

[two fingers]

Seems like public shaming to me. Trust me, the offenders themselves got messages. I know because I've been the offender. (I'm not complaining. I earned every action taken against me here.)

 

[punchdrunk]

Seems like public shaming to me. Trust me, the offenders themselves got messages. I know because I've been the offender. (I'm not complaining. I earned every action taken against me here.)

You and me both.. TBH a bit of public shaming can be useful.

 

[Chris Fitzgerald]

Moderators do not publicly comment on actions taken regarding specific users. That information remains between the moderators and member in question.

 

[punchdrunk]

Moderators do not publicly comment on actions taken regarding specific users. That information remains between the moderators and member in question.

I gathered as much, hence the suggestion for improvement.

 

[Chris Fitzgerald]

Duly noted, but this is a hard and fast rule that is not likely to change.

 

[punchdrunk]

Duly noted, but this is a hard and fast rule that is not likely to change.

Thanks Chris.