Comprehensive Rickenbacker Bass Buying Guide

SirMjac28

Patiently Waiting For The Next British Invasion
Aug 25, 2010
15,530
13,312
5,279
The Great Midwest
I'm narrowing down my choices for my first Ric and I'm wondering if there is a buying guide that goes over the differences through the years. I really want a vintage Ric and would love to know about neck profiles etc I notice the '80s have a two-piece pickguard and two additional bridge screws I would appreciate as much info as I can get. If you could include your favorite year that would be great.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jamro217 and nixdad
I'm narrowing down my choices for my first Ric and I'm wondering if there is a buying guide that goes over the differences through the years. I really want a vintage Ric and would love to know about neck profiles etc I notice the '80s have a two-piece pickguard and two additional bridge screws I would appreciate as much info as I can get. If you could include your favorite year that would be great.

I thought for sure you had a ric by now. Keep us posted, pics mandatory!
 
Play and inspect ~closely~ before your buy.

QC for Rickenbackers can be wildly hit or miss.

I swear I think one or two days a week they let the kids, who normally never get off the bench, have a whack at the assembly line out there at Rickenbacker, and it shows.

That being said, I have a 4003 (made in 2004) that I am quite pleased with, well.. once I got the dead neck pickup replaced, the neck put back straight and the crappy factory solder points redone properly.

For the no pic no bass weenies...

ErQZzqb.jpg
 
You could start with the Ric book, but remember the vintage basses have the early truss rods which were great, but my 72 did snap with the roto rs66's. There were several periods where neck profiles were thick then thin (my 72 is very thin, but similar to some of the recent thin ones). A lot of the 80s and 90s had "baseball bat" necks that were very chunky, but again I'm sure there were a few thin ones in there somewhere. Some of the recent 4003S models have been outstanding in my opinion, but as others have mentioned inconsistent. You may get a great one of those if you search and try a few out. In 1971 I ordered a 4001s and got a regular 4001. They offered to send it back and ask for another one, but after waiting almost a year I took what they gave me. It wasn't even the color I ordered! So even back then there were some wacky things going on, but I love the company, the designs and the people who play them. Good luck and let us know what you end up with!
 
I'm narrowing down my choices for my first Ric and I'm wondering if there is a buying guide that goes over the differences through the years. I really want a vintage Ric and would love to know about neck profiles etc I notice the '80s have a two-piece pickguard and two additional bridge screws I would appreciate as much info as I can get. If you could include your favorite year that would be great.

The newer 4003sw basses would be my choice

dscn3605_zpsiulz5ha5-jpg.2494377

 
I see a lot of talk about fat vs thin necks.

I've only ever owned one Ric (a 4003s from last year) and so I have nothing to compare it to. I just know that I find it really comfortable to play and I don't have large hands.

Our of curiosity I'd like to know where my neck falls in the thickness spectrum.

So, what would I measure to find out whether what I've got would be thought of as "fat" or "thin" and are there any measurement standards to compare my measurements to? Thanks!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirMjac28
I have a '79 4001 that in my experience has the nicest playing neck of any of the Rics I've tried. On top of the super-nice neck, this bass has been absolutely trouble-free. I can only recall doing a small truss rod adjustment about 15 years ago and have never had a problem with anything else on this bass.

I've had this bass since it was made and I hope that my decedents enjoy it because I'm not selling it.
 
Last edited: