Curtis Novak Precision Pickups Review (PB-90 and PB-CC)

NKBassman

Supporting Member
Jun 16, 2009
15,650
30,042
5,271
40
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
So I currently have in my possession two of Curtis Novak's precision bass pickups, the PB-90 and PB-CC. Since there is very very little information about these around, I figured I'd offer to help out the TB Braintrust a little bit before deciding ultimately which one I'm going to keep. This got a little long winded, so skip to the bottom for the Readers Digest version.

Long Story (Scroll Down for the Long Story Short):

First of all, let me say that Curtis has been great to work with! After speaking with him on the phone about what I was after, he recommended his PB-90 pickup but made sure to tell me that if I didn't like it I could exchange it for something else. The PB-90 is basically a hot-rodded P with steel poles and ceramic bar magnets. The pickup arrived after a couple of weeks, and I had it installed in my Fender Highway One Precision bass. At the same time, I also had the "Greasebucket" tone control removed in favor of a standard Precision wiring harness. 250k pots and a 0.047u cap. Big improvement!

One slight hiccup I feel compelled to mention... the pickup I ordered from Curtis did not come with a plastic shell. I had credit as Best Bass Gear and ordered a generic one, but the pole piece spacing ended up being just slightly different enough that it wouldn't fit properly! I drilled out the holes on the plastic cover to oversize them just enough to slide over the pole pieces on the PB-90, but it looks a little nasty up close. I'd recommend asking Curtis to provide a cover with the pickup to ensure there are no issues.

The PB-90 is a very nice sounding pickup with hot output! It gets really growly when you dig in, but fat and warm if you play with a light touch. I'd say it is articulate without being overly bright, but I do find myself backing off the tone control 20-30% when playing with a pick. I would not describe it as "hi-fi" or overly "clean" sounding. It sounds nasty (in a good way) like a P pickup should.

I've had a set of Dunlop Super Bright Nickels on my bass for about a month or two now, and the older they get, the better this setup sounds. When the strings were new it was a tad too brash and I was utilizing the tone knob more, but now that the strings have broken in I have no problem running it wide open.

As I think is common with hotter pickups, the PB-90 is very "mid-centric" bordering on brash/barky with brand new strings, or with "flatter" amp settings. After coming from using Dimarzio Model Ps for years, I didn't really notice at first (it is less middy than the Model P), but as the honeymoon period waned I found myself cutting more and more mids at the amp to try and get less brash midrange and more phat! Lowering the pickup helped clean it up a bit, but using the EQ at the amp was a much better solution. That being said, it can be EQ'd very nicely to achieve a wide variety of tones. I would have liked to try it in a PJ bass to see how the comb filtering between pickups made it sound, but that's not an option right now.

Eventually I emailed Curtis and he said it was no problem to exchange it for a different model, and recommended the PB-CC. He said it should have the same hot sound, but with much less pronounced midrange. He even offered to send me the new pickup first so I could try them out back to back and not have any downtime on my bass... then just return the one I didn't like and "settle up when we're done". This is great for me as this is my primary bass in two busy bands. I am averaging 2-3 rehearsals per week right now with at least one gig per month, so I didn't really want this bass down for a month while pickups were getting mailed back and forth across the border.

The PB-CC arrived last night, on my birthday no less, and I hope to get around to installing it this weekend. At first glance it looks like it has the same pole pieces and ceramic bar magnets as the PB-90, but it is wound with thicker gauge wire resulting in the pickup being much taller than standard. See pics below.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Long Story Short

1a) Curtis Novak makes really high quality pickups and is great to deal with. He was nice to talk to on the phone, shipped promptly, and will let you exchange pickups within a reasonable time period if you decide you don't like them, no questions asked.

1b) My PB-90 did not come with a plastic cover, and the center-to-center pole piece spacing was slightly different than the stock Fender and generic Best Bass Gear covers that I had on hand. I had to drill out the holes on the cover in order to fit the pickup. Best to ask Curtis to supply a cover with your pickup and avoid this issue altogether.

2) The PB-90 is a hot precision pickup with steel pole pieces and ceramic bar magnets. Very responsive to right hand technique, going from phat and warm to gnarly grind with increasing strength of attack. Sounds great finger style and very growly with a pick. However, it can lean towards a brash/barky midrange sound, as is common with hotter pickups. I would not describe is as a "vintage" sounding P pickup, but great for someone wanting a hotter, more upfront sound with a more pronounced midrange. Takes EQ well at the amp and the extra mids can be tamed easily enough.

3) I just received a PB-CC from Curtis to try/exchange for the PB-90. Review forthcoming. By Curtis' account it should be just as hot but without the pronounced midrange. Construction seems top notch, with the same pole pieces and bar magnets as the PB-90, but thicker gauge wire.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Clips

PB-90

">


PB-CC
">
 
Last edited:
PB-CC Pictures.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    315.6 KB · Views: 464
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    300.9 KB · Views: 397
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    296.7 KB · Views: 404
To those watching this thread, I have to apologize for not moving on this yet. It's been a busy week of rehearsals for some upcoming gigs.

I recorded our band practice the other night with my Zoom H4n, and included a Radial JDI directly off the bass on one of the Aux inputs. I'll review these recordings this weekend and see if there's anything worth sharing.

EDIT: Nothing I'd care to share from those clips. :p
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MarkA and ctmullins
I recorded some clips of the PB-90 today, and posted them in the original post.

I was using Reaper, recorded direct into the Hi-Z input of my Universal Audio M610 tube preamp, through a line input on my Tascam US-1641 interface. No compression or EQ.

Fender Highway One P bass, Greasebucket removed, Dunlop Super Bright Nickel strings (~2 months old).

I apologize for the "Slap" clip. :p

The plan is to record identical clips after I get the PB-CC swapped out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
I installed the PB-CC tonight only to wind up with a wicked ground hum. After reflowing some solder and installing a spare brass shielding plate I had laying around, she's quiet as a mouse now. With headphones on through my 3Leaf Enabler I had to pluck a string just to see if there was any signal present at all. No hum, buzz, or static at all.

At first glance the PB-CC sounds about how I expected it to. Same basic character as the PB-90, but much clearer and more open sounding in the midrange. It's still fat in the lows, with a slightly subdued top end, though that may be more the worn in rounds than the pickup. Overall it sounds clearer and more "dry", and I don't find myself reaching for the mid-cut knob right away. I like it so far.

Playing along to some mp3s, it seems to sit nicely in the mix, and is very friendly with EQ adjustments. Also very sensitive to right hand placement and technique.

I had no trouble getting the taller bobbin to sit at the depth I like. I lowered the pickup just enough to enhance some clarity without losing all the wooliness.

I have rehearsals tomorrow and Thursday to fine tune the setup for my gig on Saturday and really get a feel for it, but I think I already know which pickup I'm going to keep.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
Try it with something other than Dunlop Super Brights. Maybe throw some GHS Roundcore Bass Boomers on there. The Dunlops will always sound pretty bright, they are similar to DR Sunbeams.

Not likely. The Super Brights are the first set of rounds I've tried that I actually think are aging nicely. I love the way they've broken in and mellowed out. It's not an overly bright sound (anymore). When they were new I was riding the tone knob a bit more, but now that they've settled down I'm quite pleased with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveAceofBass
Round One
  • Classic rock band rehearsal
  • Broughton HPF; Fairfield Barbershop; Diamond BCP; Aguilar TH500; fEarful 15/6
  • Point: PB-CC

Definitely sits a lot better IN in the mix, as opposed to ploughing through it like the PB-90. Less grind from the 18Sound mid driver, but still clear and articulate. Digging in it gets more grind happening without getting too farty. Still just as fat in the low end, and hot signal over all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
Round Two
  • Top 40 Country band rehearsal
  • Same Pedals, Same amp, Ampeg SVT210AV cab
  • Point: PB-CC
Same deal here. Much easier to dial in a nice fat full tone that doesn't overpower everything with midrange. I find the 210AV cabs a bit darker than the fEarful, and the extra midrange of the PB-90 did work well with these cabs to help bring out a little more character from the cab, but I boosted the top end a little more at the amp to compensate, and... great tone! Sounded great with the drop-D stuff we do, too.

Fundraiser gig with the classic rock cover band tomorrow, and then it's clips time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
Where would you say, in the frequency spectrum, the pb-cc peaks and dips? I know this is tough to answer and of course has to do with the rig; i'm just trying to get a better grasp on this thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NKBassman