For aircraft enthusiasts: the history of the drone.

Nov 27, 2003
1,994
5,198
5,451
48
The Netherlands
Disclosures
Rogue luthier employed at Knooren Handcrafted bass guitars
71WQbHtDi4L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg

Well, it's very difficult to deny, but drones have become such a big part of our daily lives that we tend to take them for granted. The drone pretty much replaced the helicopter as the main means to do aerial shots for film duties, since it's much cheaper to operate. Drones are also used to deliver packages and of course are used as bombers in the most recent conflicts around the world. After all, why should you risk the lives of a crew when you can send out a drone to do your dirty work for you?
predator-firing-missile4.jpg


But every story needs to start somewhere, and I figured it to be fun to talk about the history of the drone. And that said history starts with THIS man, Geoffrey De Havilland.
Sir-Geoffrey-de-Havilland.jpg

Now there are aviation pioneers and then there's THIS guy, there's very little in the world of aviation's golden era where this man didn't have something to do with. From providing the DH-4 designs to the US Army so they could enter the first world war with an actual sizable air force, to producing the very first jet powered airliner. This man was there, getting work done and accumulating a résumé that would never be surpassed.

But what many don't know about De Havilland was that he also was a very enthusiastic entomologist, with a keen eye for flying insects. It was reflected in the names for his aircraft.
200000544-001.webp

The DH-90 Dragonfly

De%20Havilland%20Mosquito.jpg

The DH-98 Mosquito

WZ7jVl17BKkegAv2Rvd-QpZdPxiROXcXaKbhST0xuBegU_D1I0YKaki1akupPvPl-zuIdIhlRsKXFU0AtKWbyYzlBuwmUGKjzLEMQSFbuTs5XNYT4w

The DH-103 Hornet

And it was one of those insect named planes that became the very first drone.
de-Havilland-DH.82-Tiger-Moth-Flying.jpg

The DH-89 Tiger Moth was one of the most widely used planes of De Havilland in the interwar period and during the second world war. With many examples still airworthy today. A primary trainer, it earned a reputation for being stable, easy to fly and being well liked by its pilots.

De Havilland himself got word from the admiralty that there was a need for a dedicated target aircraft, so their anti-aircraft gunners could hone their craft before they would be sent into battle. Realizing that both the Royal Air Force and the Naval air force would be going “Have you gone bleeding bonkers?!” when asked about endangering a pilot's life for that goal, the R&D of his company came up with THIS.
TenStories23.jpeg

This is the DH-89B Queen Bee, the first radio-controlled full sized plane ever.
queen_bee_500.jpg

And here's one being operated from the ground.

It was a master stroke and a revolution, now there was a plane available which sole purpose was to be shot from the sky. The US Navy, seeing the merits of that idea, bought the rights for the technology and quickly put it into production. And in tribute to Geoffrey De Havilland's entomology was named “the Drone”

So what exactly is a Drone?
Role-of-Drone-Honeybee-in-the-Beehive.jpg

Well a drone is a male bee, whose only purpose in life is to fly from one hive to another, mate with the queen and die, thus avoiding inbreeding. It flies only once during its lifetime, a very fitting name.

But while the drone has evolved over the years into a platform for both commercial and combat duties, it still is used for its original purpose, to be shot from the sky as target practice.
c9111f_80b4453634494964ba1a46de00f46f21~mv2.jpg

QF-4 Phantom drones awaiting their fate.
AIM-54_Phoenix_destroys_QF-4_drone_1983.jpeg

A Phantom drone being shot out of the sky by a missile fire from an F-14 in the early eighties.
 
You didn't mention the Germans use of unmanned Bombers in the late part of WW2.
I remember a fighter strapped to an unmanned bomber ....Would this count as early Drone use as terror weapons

View attachment 7086123
View attachment 7086124

View attachment 7086125

Mistel
Actually, there's a reason why I didn't name the Mistel or the V-1 flying bomb.

That reason being that they were both unguided missiles. In the case of the Mistel, the aircraft on top would control the wing and tail surfaces of the plane below, but via mechanical means, rather than remote control. As the two would disconnect, the unmanned bomber would fly on its own until hitting its intended target, but doing so without any means of controlling where it went.

Same with the V-1 flying bomb, it would just be aimed and launched, falling out of the sky as the fuel ran out.

No remote control here, no directing it home if for some reason the mission had to be aborted, they were not drones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murphy