Hey all.
Looking to pick up a new head to go with a new cab (fearful 12/6 I'm haggling over)
I had a mesa d800 that had a lot going for it but ultimately was too dark sounding.
Also have had gk mb500 that was good but "upgraded" to the mesa.
My only bass is a passive MIM Geddy Lee jazz, have some pedals like omnicabsim mini, muff, oc2 type octaver.
The two I'm looking at (used) are
Bergantino Forte
Tecamp Puma 900
Forte:
Pros:
-have played through one in a music store out of town (not through my own bass or cab)
- great clean sound, lots of clarity, easy to tweak, 2ohm stable (but doubtful ever needed)
- buying from authorized dealer so have 90 day warranty on used gear + optional extended warranty
Cons
- size/weight - 6.2lbs, larger form factor
- power at 8 ohms (350 watts) for the Fearful cab
- more expensive (~$100USD more)
Puma 900:
Pros:
- arguably more power - 900 @4ohm (some here on tb have said measured at ~750) and at 8ohm (650watts)
- size/weight - much smaller, 2.4 lbs!
- taste knob - easy to dial in different tones?
- cheaper by ~$100USD less
- comes with a carry case
Cons:
- haven't played through it, less demo's online - less sure of it's tonal qualities
- buying used through classifieds - no returns, warranties, etc etc
- no 2.67 or 2ohm operation.
What are the tonal differences between the two?
I know the forte offers more clarity than the mesa, does the puma as well?
If the puma and the forte are in the same tonal ballpark, part of me feels like getting the smaller, more powerful amp and saving some cash.
Anyone have input?
I've seen threads exalting both but hard to tell fact from fanboi sometimes.
Looking to pick up a new head to go with a new cab (fearful 12/6 I'm haggling over)
I had a mesa d800 that had a lot going for it but ultimately was too dark sounding.
Also have had gk mb500 that was good but "upgraded" to the mesa.
My only bass is a passive MIM Geddy Lee jazz, have some pedals like omnicabsim mini, muff, oc2 type octaver.
The two I'm looking at (used) are
Bergantino Forte
Tecamp Puma 900
Forte:
Pros:
-have played through one in a music store out of town (not through my own bass or cab)
- great clean sound, lots of clarity, easy to tweak, 2ohm stable (but doubtful ever needed)
- buying from authorized dealer so have 90 day warranty on used gear + optional extended warranty
Cons
- size/weight - 6.2lbs, larger form factor
- power at 8 ohms (350 watts) for the Fearful cab
- more expensive (~$100USD more)
Puma 900:
Pros:
- arguably more power - 900 @4ohm (some here on tb have said measured at ~750) and at 8ohm (650watts)
- size/weight - much smaller, 2.4 lbs!
- taste knob - easy to dial in different tones?
- cheaper by ~$100USD less
- comes with a carry case
Cons:
- haven't played through it, less demo's online - less sure of it's tonal qualities
- buying used through classifieds - no returns, warranties, etc etc
- no 2.67 or 2ohm operation.
What are the tonal differences between the two?
I know the forte offers more clarity than the mesa, does the puma as well?
If the puma and the forte are in the same tonal ballpark, part of me feels like getting the smaller, more powerful amp and saving some cash.
Anyone have input?
I've seen threads exalting both but hard to tell fact from fanboi sometimes.