Number of Pieces vs Number of People

So, say you're in a band. This band has four members. Only three of these members play an instrument; the fourth member sings and plays no instrument. Are you a three piece? Or are you a four piece.

Take, for example, Stone Temple Pilots. Four people. Three piece? Four piece?

Thanks.
 
Take, for example, Stone Temple Pilots. Four people. Three piece? Four piece?
your question contains its own answer!

a good as they were, STP was never worth a damn without scott wieland, that was their curse. by definition that was a four-piece band.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodeanly
Tricky question, but not for the obvious reason.

Vox is an intrument.

Therefore, Zep was a four piece. But wait! JPJ also played keys, mandolin, and guitar. Robert Plant played Harmonica. I know, but yes, Harmonica is an instrument. Trouble is, with these guys, they only did one thing at a time.

Okay, let's take a better example: Rush - three musicians, but the guitarist and bassist play keys either with their feet or fingers, and the drummer does the same with sticks. While they play the traditional guitar, bass, and drums. Three guys, lotta instuments.

In traditional combos, each musician does one thing. In modern combos, the options are quite a bit more open. I think the word "piece" doesn't work like it used to for modern music. So my definition rests on number of musicians on stage.

No, not dancers, thank you. Musicians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueAliceOasis
Tricky question, but not for the obvious reason.

Vox is an intrument.
This seems a no-brainer. I get that not all singers work at it, especially at the bar-band level, but to not consider a vocalist a musician is bad form.

I've worked with a couple of vocalists who work hard. From constant humming and doing vocal exercises, working to get an extra note or two beyond their range, learning proper technique to not destroy the vocal cords, and so much more. It's hard work for those who take it seriously, just like any other instrument.
 
This is one of the weirdest queries I've seen on TB. OP, do you really go around referring to bands with four members as a "three-piece" band? My knee-jerk reaction to that would be to advise against doing that. It doesn't really sound good.
Nope. We fired one of our guitarists and someone looked confused when we told him that we were now only a four piece. I was just making sure. Thanks for assuming.
 
I often describe our band as a "4 piece with a singer" when the venue is small. In small places I would always get the follow up of "how loud is your 5 piece?". Whereas they seem to think a 4 piece might work.
Might be my imagination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodeanly