Question about the finish quality of the Ibanez SR600E bass

Feb 7, 2020
15
2
2,958
I'm looking for a new bass, and initially, I like the Ibanez SR600E, but I'm concerned that the finish might be like the SR500, which wears out very quickly. Can anyone who has had it for a while tell me if this one is better? I don't mind whether it's the Cosmic Blue Starburst Flat or the Antique Brown Stained Burst. Thanks in advance!
 
I know which finish you're talking about and it looks to be the same in a different color. A lot of the wear depends on the player. I gigged a circa 2000's SR500 (brown mahogany) for years and practiced incessantly. Never got the wear marks that most people inflict, and I'm not a light-touch player.

My $0.02, but any bass is going to experience wear and tear with regular use. Might as well be one you find comfy and tonally satisfying :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snert
Well, just what I feared xD... also, I play with a pick and quite hard... but anyway, thanks a lot for your opinion. It's just that, for me, it's important that the bass looks good; I can't stand playing an instrument that looks damaged. I'll have to consider other options.
 
The "brown mahogany" finsh was some industrial version of Minwax Polyshades, which is just stain suspended in polyurethane. The stain never sinks into the wood, so any chip goes right back to bare wood. I have some cheap furniture with a similar finish, it's quick and easy to apply in a factory setting in one shot, but it chips easily. It was more or less universal on the SR500's, every used one you see on Ebay or Reverb is worn through where the players thumb touches the body, or other "sweet spots". It's a shame, beacause the SR500 is otherwise a superb bass. I don't know if they are still using the same finish on newer basses, but unless you can find out definitively, I'd avoid any "brown" mahogany finish basses from Ibanez. I've always wanted to get one of the used SR500 and strip it down for a complete refin in something easily repairable like Tru Oil, they are great players.
 
This is what most of the Brown Mahogany finish SR basses look like after a few years, in fact I've never seen a used one that didn't. To add to the confsion, there are several variants of the SR500 with different finishes that look fine, go figure. This one looks generally beat on and neglected too, that fingerboard looks... crusty.
 
I haven’t seen this in any other Ibanez model, weren’t the SR500 made in Indonesia, not Japan? They still have brand new ones at GC last I was there, hopefully they fixed the finish.
The 600E's are made in Indonesia.
I figure it's because the finish is more of a stain and the grain of the wood is very much evident in sight and touch. I can see how thumb or fingernails could easily wear it away.
I personally really like the worn out look.
 
That’s your bass then, superb self-relic feature. Personally, I like em’ pretty., but to each their own. The SR505 is the only five string I’ve picked up in my small/average mitts and not immediately put back down as too chunky for my taste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveLo42
See post #5. Big difference between MIK and MII in more ways than finish. I don't know when production shifted to Indonesia but it coincided with a change in woods (and weight!) and an added switch. I have tried to like them because of the lighter weight but i will take my Korean made 505 any day.
 
That’s your bass then, superb self-relic feature.
I have 3 with the brown finish, the oldest being MY13 (and 17 and 19) and none off them have any self relicing. The finish is pretty easy to repair if several YT videos are correct. None the less, it's a crap finish and I'd prefer it was a gloss even <shudder> a burst. For my 206s price I don't care but the SRC6s are in another price bracket like the 5xx and 6xx and deserve better.