So, I recently picked up a used rumble 500, and it's great. I was on the fence between the 500 and stage 800, because I think I would enjoy tinkering around with all the modeling options, even if I don't really need them for my band's gigs.
Ultimately, I found a killer deal on a used 500, so I couldn't justify the extra cost for the stage 800. (Especially after the recent price increases across the rumble line)
However, I'm now toying with the idea of buying a rumble studio 40 to kind of have the best of both worlds, by running the effects send of the studio 40 to the effects return of the 500. I'm really just wondering if anyone has tried this, or if it's a good/bad idea. (Note that the studio 40 does have an effects loop, unlike the normal rumble 40)
It seems that studio 40s pop up here and there on the used market in the $250-$300 range. So really, I could get these two amps for less than what I'd spend on a stage 800, unless I were to find a good deal on a used 800. The 350-500W of the 500 is plenty for me, I wouldn't need the 800 ever. It seems like having the modeling in a more modular format might have some advantages, for example, I can sell it if I don't like it, and I'll still have the 500 so I won't be in the market for a new amp, as would be the case if I had and sold the 800. If I love the sound of studio 40, I can make that my primary sound and it will be a smaller practice amp, I can haul less gear to gigs where a PA is available, and then the 500 would basically serve for adding wattage to my 40 when we don't have a PA system available or it could serve as additional stage monitoring for bass.
Anyway, anyone have any experience doing something similar? Would it be more trouble than it's worth? Is it even possible to daisy chain a studio 40 with a 500 in the way I'm describing and get the 500 volume? Would just getting the 800 make more sense if I REALLY wanted the modeling features?
Ultimately, I found a killer deal on a used 500, so I couldn't justify the extra cost for the stage 800. (Especially after the recent price increases across the rumble line)
However, I'm now toying with the idea of buying a rumble studio 40 to kind of have the best of both worlds, by running the effects send of the studio 40 to the effects return of the 500. I'm really just wondering if anyone has tried this, or if it's a good/bad idea. (Note that the studio 40 does have an effects loop, unlike the normal rumble 40)
It seems that studio 40s pop up here and there on the used market in the $250-$300 range. So really, I could get these two amps for less than what I'd spend on a stage 800, unless I were to find a good deal on a used 800. The 350-500W of the 500 is plenty for me, I wouldn't need the 800 ever. It seems like having the modeling in a more modular format might have some advantages, for example, I can sell it if I don't like it, and I'll still have the 500 so I won't be in the market for a new amp, as would be the case if I had and sold the 800. If I love the sound of studio 40, I can make that my primary sound and it will be a smaller practice amp, I can haul less gear to gigs where a PA is available, and then the 500 would basically serve for adding wattage to my 40 when we don't have a PA system available or it could serve as additional stage monitoring for bass.
Anyway, anyone have any experience doing something similar? Would it be more trouble than it's worth? Is it even possible to daisy chain a studio 40 with a 500 in the way I'm describing and get the 500 volume? Would just getting the 800 make more sense if I REALLY wanted the modeling features?