Completely unrelated. I set up several concerts and workshops for Scodanibbio. Scodanibbio was a pretty serious guy and I don't think he would be amused in the least, but that isn't important.EDM is a child of Terry Riley -- among many others -- and I think Scodanibbio would be proud.
I am not into EDM, and usually hate this sort of thing with every fiber of my being - but this is done so incredibly well I have very mixed feelings about it!The first piece is a classic of electronic dance music by Daft Punk. The second two are more edm styles, the last with the electronic specific "wobble" sound of dubstep imitated acoustically. I love edm and think it’s wonderful to treat it this way.
The playing is fantastic. However, lets be clear: the extended techniques comes straight from Scodanibbio who got them from Fernando Grillo. There is a bit from Turetzky as well. It shouldn't take some lightweight pop material to bring them to the attention of anyone serious about the double bass.
Answer one: When it gets this specific, maybe! Answer two It is a not a 1:1 relationship. In Batrok's day there wasn't an over arching gross, desperate trend of art spaces trying to turn themselves in dive bars and dance clubs to pander. There weren't new music ensembles named after Aphex Twin songs to pander. For example.I didn't realize you had to cite your sources every time you use a technique. I like to get on the mic and announce "this technique is actually based on Franz Simandl" before every gig I play.
Would you say that Bartok or Mahler using folk melodies as a basis for their compositions makes them unserious?
This strikes me as surprisingly close-minded and snobbish for someone who is usually pretty open-minded. Have you listened deeply to Aphex? What are you being so purist about. There's a reason why experimental folks love it and Phillip Glass collaborates with him. It's not adding a cover of Eleanor Rigby to a soul-jazz set. It's a lot more like Stravinsky -- something radical which became popular with little effort to do so because of how challenging it is not despite it. Music today is not like you describe, a giant corporate machine making decisions. It is countless subcultures from weird Mexican hip-hop to Mumbai electronica which interact with and are sometime coopted by the mainstream but also have their own vibrant lives. More generally keeping subtle music in safe spaces keeps it away from many who might love it.
None of this bares on the Suggs which we all agree is awesome.