The low down on the Classic 50's Precision Vs the AVRI '63 P

AngelCrusher

Supporting Member
Sep 12, 2004
5,145
5,904
5,067
Disclosures
Mesa Boogie, Tech 21, Taylor
0g5aJQJl.jpg


MCePYDkl.jpg


QUZ0nA8l.jpg



This thread is more of an essay than a question since I now own both, and I bet I am not the only one.

For years now I have wanted 2 Precisions so I could put flats on one, but I put it off for a while. Well the bug finally got to me. I sold every bass I had besides my Moollon J 5 and played a lot of Pbasses. I made a thread on it and really enjoyed the whole process. On a side note, I had been buying basses in the $600ish or less dollar range to use as a backup. I had an Ernie Ball SUB which was pretty nice, but could not beat out any of the others in the studio, I had a Bacchus craft Jazz that was incredibly made, and I used on records, but didn't have the warmer vintage J tone I like. I also had an Ibanez Road Star II that was modded and was rather awesome, but I realized I was more of a straight Pbass guy and just needed tone and volume.

A month or so ago, I got a deal on a new AVRI 63 in olympic white. Posted pics in the AVRI thread. I immediately took to that bass. The tone, the feel of the neck, the straightness of it, low action, the look. Everything about it is perfect to me. I have played it about 30 hours a week since and love how it sounds when I record with it.

I realized that I could not get a Pbass without those vintage frets and that awesome neck. But I didn't want another pricey bass. I wanted something under $1k that I could put flats on and use as a second bass. I also wanted a maple neck since I already had rosewood. This seemed like a lot to ask for at a low price, so I put the need on hold. That is until I saw the Classic 50's Precision. Exactly what I was looking for. Plus you can find these things basically brand new for $600 or so. I found one in Fiesta Red, and pulled the trigger. So how does it measure up?

Well off the bat, the look of the bass is very cool. It's a unique color combo with the gold pickguard. Does it match the AVRI in looks? IMO, no. The AVRIs are stunning instruments and even without having real clay dots, the combo of the paint job and neck is just awesome. But the 50's still looks really good. In fact, I prefer it to the American Standards, which are more plain. The 50's has some real character to it.

Besides having a poly finish, I have to say the 50's feels fantastic in the hand. It is the same size neck as the AVRI and it is very fast due to the different finish. The neck is as good as the AVRI, in fact mine has a really cool subtle grain pattern near the upper frets that I think makes it look great. This neck also has some vintage tint, but it is not overdone. I have played and owned enough Fenders in my day, and if you handed me this bass and said it was $600, I would never believe it. The only sign of any lesser quality is the synthetic nut, which is still well made and not something I'm really in a rush to swap out.

The tone. I A/B'd this with my AVRI and I currently do not see the need to swap the pickup. Compared to the AVRI it has a little less richness in the mids and a little less growl, but it's a very good pickup. It has a little more in the highs and a little less in the mids. Just a different character but nothing I see myself changing.

Setup - easy. The bass came with a very straight neck. I maxxed the rod out just to see how it went, and I found myself needing turn it back to where it was because the backbow was perfect. With TI flats installed, it has very low action and plays itself without any choked notes. Intonation was dead easy. It is a Pbass, and setting them up is an enjoyable and painless process. With the flats on, it really delivers in tone. I switched back and forth between the two basses and they both are fantastic in mixes. Very inspiring tones, and they are both complimentary.

The verdict for me is that anyone who wants a vintage playing P would love these things. I can play the 50's and it does not feel like a step down from my AVRI. The quality is very very good for the price. Why is it so inexpensive in comparison? Well the craftmanship of the AVRI is exceptional. when I took the neck off of the 50's, I noticed extra screw holes in the pocket. It was not as flawless as an AVRI, but it has no effect on the bass. The tuners are also inferior to the AVRI, which has some of the best tuners on any bass I have owned. They are not awful by any means though, and I doubt I will swap them out. Also, the AVRI comes with an incredible case, lots of extra stuff in it and ashtray and pickup covers. The classic 50's comes in a modest gig bag, not a lot of case candy and no ashtrays. I dont care about any of that stuff, although the case for the AVRI is absolutely awesome.

The low down for me is that you simply can not go wrong with the Classic 50's P. It's that good for the price. If you can find one for less than $700, just get it. I know some people can not get on with the chunky necks, but I think it is the best neck in the game personally. While the AVRI is still my main player, I am convinced anyone who plays both basses will come away wanting to have one of each. And if you shop smart, you can make that happen for under $2,000 total.

Super impressed with Fender, and I am sure others who have owned both will chime in with their own thoughts as well.
 
Last edited:
Quick update. I wanted to try out different flats on the classic 50's P and I have the Fenders that come with the AVRI, Chromes and TI Flats. The Fenders were my least favorite, as the tone was a little too dull for my tastes. I do love the Chromes a lot, and honestly they just feel a bit stiff. I believe the TI's are my winner, as the tone is so nice and focused in the mids. It brings out the most growl of the 3 sets. I guess TI Flats and a 50's P is not exactly a unique combo, but it just works so well. I must say that the Chromes continue to impress and are a very close second. Awesome strings.
 
Congrats! I've had my 50's for about a month now. I put on La bella 760FL's and I'm very pleased with the sound I'm getting out of it. I couldn't agree more about the neck. I was able to adjust to it after a few hours and now it's just super comfortable. I haven't even picked up my Ric 4003w in far too long since I've been so busy noodling with the 50's. Enjoy it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelCrusher
Whatever you do, don't try a '58 AV... You will immediately be coming up with plans on how to score one! They are just as nice as the '63, but with a slightly different flavor. I traded mine for my '63 because I like the rosewood board better, but I would have kept it if I could have afforded to. Also, it was 7 lbs 8oz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelCrusher
Nice "essay." I appreciate the time you put into it.

I may get an AVRI '63 P at some point down the road. But for the time being, my '50s Classic P – strung with Fender-branded flats, which might or might not be a D'Addario product – is satisfying my jones for a Motown-ish tone.

Out of curiosity, what's the weight difference between the two? My '50s Classic P is one of the lightest full-bodied basses I've ever owned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pudgychef
Nice "essay." I appreciate the time you put into it.

I may get an AVRI '63 P at some point down the road. But for the time being, my '50s Classic P – strung with Fender-branded flats, which might or might not be a D'Addario product – is satisfying my jones for a Motown-ish tone.

Out of curiosity, what's the weight difference between the two? My '50s Classic P is one of the lightest full-bodied basses I've ever owned.

Thanks. Weight feels the same to me. Honestly, the 50's is such a good bass that the AVRI is just a really nice luxury. I do prefer the tone of the AVRI a bit more, and having two P basses so you can have one with rounds is great as well. But since I have gotten the 50's I can go back and forth between the two without feeling one is a lesser instrument or won't record as well.

I am pretty sure that Fender used almost all USA parts and electronics and then just had it assembled in Mexico. It's a much higher quality than the MIM standards I've played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMARK
I gave the Chromes a week and went back to TI flats. There is just something about the feel of the slimmer, flexy flatwound string against the big P neck that is just heaven. Also, the tone is the best too. Looks like I'm done. That was pretty easy.
 
One update - the output on the 50s is lower than the avri. Its probably a 3-4db difference. Nothing crazy, but i wondered if that is something anyone fixed or messed with before. My pickup height is the proper distance from the strings, so thats not an issue.
 
I have a trans blond AVRI '57, with Chrome flats, and a Classic 50s Black with stock rounds. They both play awesome, and sound awesome. Recently took the MIM to a bass player friend's party where his band was playing in his garage for neighbors, and he played it all night (except for the handful of songs he let me sit in for). He loved it. One other dude - a Jazz bass player - tried it out, and I thought "this will be good, he'll be all over the neck like JPJ" which he was, and said his hand was pretty crampy afterwards. The first guy felt it was forcing him into the pocket, but he's pretty much a pocket player anyway.

Feel-wise, they seem indistinguishable to me, they have as much in common as any two AVRI '57s, IMHO, and more in common with each other than either has with an American Standard (which I've also owned several of).

I agree the Classic 50s is an incredible bargain. I swapped out the gold pick guard for a black one, and it looks supper sweet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelCrusher