USB Microphone for recording 5-string bass covers dropped down to A0.

I tried to search the other threads. Some recommended the Lauten 220 and Sterling St170. The SM57 is listed for 40Hz. I want down to 30/28Hz. Other recommendations? I've started to record bass covers for YT but the Victure I have which says is good for 20Hz is muddy below 40Hz (but excellent for D/G strings). Thanks for your time and input. I'm an amateur I just want my B0 or even A0 recordings to have some presentable resolution.
 
Honestly, I'd just go direct and use an amp sim in the DAW. If you want to mic a bass rig, particularly for a 5 string, you'd need a high quality ribbon mic, an acoustically treated room, a decent mic preamp, some knowledge of mic placement, etc. Without these you'll just be adding more low frequency mud.

Also, consider that 99 out of 100 people will be listening on earbuds or speaker systems that can't even reproduce frequencies under 50hz anyway.
 
27.4hz is something most people can't hear.
Headphones/earbuds can reproduce it.
Grab some headphones and listen to a sine wave at 27.4 (a pure sine wave, not a clipped one)

The real tone is in all the harmonics not the fundamentals. The harmonics will steer your brain to derive the fundamental, you don't have to hear it.

Rethink this, listen to some bass tracks you really like, and then put a RTA on it to actually see where the bass frequencies are focused. I'll be surprised if you find one that goes as low as what you're looking for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: And I and DirtDog
I really appreciate all this feedback. Thank you. I'm going to give the direct output a try I have a decent combo amp and new PC with a nice speaker system. I picked up an audio interface today. Again, thanks for the feedback it helped with direction and perspective. Peace.
 
I did, I picked up a Pyle PAD43 mixer. It seems to have everything I think I need (now), pretty good reviews and under $100. I have XLR/XLR and XLR to 1/4" cables with 1/8" adapters but I want to start with the USB input on the PC. And it gives me something to fiddle with. Peace.
 
DI and try to find out what the exact first order harmonics are and emphasize those.
A 20 hz frequency is about 56 feet long / 17 meter long
A 40 hz frequency is 28 feet long / 8,5 meter. If we wanted to be absolutely sure acoustically, we need a room at least 28 (56) feet long in every dimension (! this includes height) in order to not have this long, low frequency wave cause any acoustical issues at our listening position.
As a poster above wrote, if our brain hears the first order harmonics, it kind of complements the fundamental. That sounds far cleaner than a room, that doesn't fullfill the above mentioned criteria.
 
You have a higher level of understanding of the physics above me, respectfully. My recording room is 20x18x15. I don’t have many songs I want cover below B0 but I’d like to play them and it not sound like mud. I do understand wave resonance through a length of medium so it exits not at the wrong nodes. Just trying to record covers of Crowbar and Dawn of Solace.
 
You have a higher level of understanding of the physics above me, respectfully. (...).
This is just superficial knowledge, learned by reading:)
Conclusion:
Don't record low frequency rich material with a mic in an untreated room without bass traps etc.
Leave the fundamentals in - some of them - but don't emphasize them, just the first order harmonics (100 hz - 300 hz).
 
A 40 hz frequency is 28 feet long / 8,5 meter. If we wanted to be absolutely sure acoustically, we need a room at least 28 (56) feet long in every dimension (! this includes height) in order to not have this long, low frequency wave cause any acoustical issues at our listening position.

Bad science. Why don't headphones don't have a problem with those frequencies?
 
Bad science. Why don't headphones don't have a problem with those frequencies?
How Do Headphones Produce Sub-Bass & Bass Frequencies?
First, let’s repeat a statement I made previously. Low-end frequencies are felt more than they are heard. We can feel the low-end of a kick drum at a live event or the deep bass of a subwoofer on the dancefloor.

Of course, we can sometimes feel the vibrations of bass-heavy music in our headphones but it is faint and localized around our ears.

That is to say that the ways in which headphones produce bass are much less visceral than the ways in which subwoofers produce bass.

Headphones do not have to propel bass frequencies across long distances in order for the listener to hear them. The drivers/speakers of headphones are practically attached to the listeners’ ears.

Proximity
The close proximity of the headphone driver to the eardrum means the driver (headphone speaker) doesn’t have to move as much air to produce a decent bass response when the headphones are worn properly.

The inverse-square law state that the intensity of a sound wave is quartered for every doubling of distance. In other words, the sound pressure level drops by 6 dB for every doubling of distance.

Try moving your earbuds or headphones just an inch from your ears and you’ll hear the distance. Since the low-end requires a lot of energy, more energy will be lost for every doubling of distance. Put another way, a quartering of the intensity of a bass frequency is perceived as a greater drop in loudness.

Closed Space/Tunnel
Many headphone/earbud form factors create a sealed (or at least a semi-sealed) enclosure with the speaker on one end and the eardrum on the other. This coupling of diaphragms allows the bass frequencies to have more of an effect on the eardrum and a greater perceived loudness.

This helps to explain why closed-back headphones often have more perceived bass than open-back headphones and why pushing earbuds further into your ear canal will also boost the perceived bass response.

Bone Conduction
We’ve been discussing the eardrum quite a bit in this section. However, the eardrums themselves aren’t overly reactive to frequencies below 80 Hz. Remember how we feel these low-end frequencies more than we hear them?

Well, our brains still process these low vibrations as sound but we rely more on the resonances of our bodies to sense these sound waves.

With headphones, this is where the ear structure and bone conduction come into play.

Basically, the sound vibrations in the headphones physically vibrate our skull and the tiny bones in our ears, which sends signals to our brain that help us perceive the sound frequencies. This is particularly true of bass frequencies.

Over-the-ear headphones press against our skulls and can so their bass frequencies are more easily perceived.

Do Headphones Have Subwoofers & How Do HPs Produce Bass? | My New Microphone

I use a "Pleasureboard" at home. This is just a motor (a speaker in a way is a motor too). You sit or stand on a Pleasureboard and this does to the entire body, what headphones do in a limited way. Feels like standing in front of a gigantic bass-speaker, when you're just listening at low volume through your nearfield monitors. Or you watch water bottles dancing on your board.



There is a reason besides all the jokes about people buying them that Beats-Headphones became so popular. They kind of try to make up for the missing body resonance of "real" bass with overemphasized bass. Not so bad a science.
 
Last edited:
Do Headphones Have Subwoofers & How Do HPs Produce Bass? | My New Microphone

I use a "Pleasureboard" at home. This is just a motor (a speaker in a way is a motor too). You sit or stand on a Pleasureboard and this does to the entire body, what headphones do in a limited way. Feels like standing in front of a gigantic bass-speaker, when you're just listening at low volume through your nearfield monitors. Or you watch water bottles dancing on your board.



There is a reason besides all the jokes about people buying them that Beats-Headphones became so popular. They kind of try to make up for the missing body resonance of "real" bass with overemphasized bass. Not so bad a science.


Apparently I didn't make myself clear. My "Bad science" remark referred to your statement that you would need a big room to do away with acoustic anomalies in low frequencies because low frequencies have long wavelengths, and I used headphones to illustrate my point.
 
Hi Dirk, Knumbskull et al

I’m happy with the Pyle PAD43. It’s got the connections, lots of tweaking, etc I need at present. Easy to set up. Curiously though, the yield through the DAW is actually better (cleaner/volume) when I connect the bass in directly and not into the amp and then direct out to the Pyle, both in pre and post EQ modes.

I think I might use the mic for brighter songs and the Pyle set up for the lowest/lower tone based songs.

Peace

This is just superficial knowledge, learned by reading:)
Conclusion:
Don't record low frequency rich material with a mic in an untreated room without bass traps etc.
Leave the fundamentals in - some of them - but don't emphasize them, just the first order harmonics (100 hz - 300 hz).