Amp and emulated signal in FOH?

Greetings fellow bass players,

Right from the start sorry for the noob/complicated question. I am fairly new to the bass game and this forum and I need some help on my live setup. Currently, I have a pedal-board that has Darkglass pedal going into Line6 HX stomp. I am using HX stomp for routing (to the amp and a separated emulated signal) and couple of effects.

Which brings me to the question, If a venue allows me to plug into FOH with my emulated signal(amp, IR), how big of an amp do I need on stage, and do I need one at all? I am getting conflicting stories on this and it is a bit confusing. Size wise, I am talking about a mid-sized venue.

Currently, I have an Ampeg 4x10 and SVT7 Pro and dragging that thing off and on stage is a pain, especially when there are gigs with 10 bands in the roster and we need to setup quick. Is this too bit or too small? Can I go smaller with some kind of a combo amp that I can plop on stage easier?

Thank you
Depends on whether or not you have good monitors for everyone. One place we used to play preferred to run everyone through their FOH and didn't want any amps on the stage. It was no problem because I had a good monitor. Previously at that same location I was using two 12" cabs and running them with my 800-watt Eden amp. I could easily have used a 400-watt amp for that because my master was set at 9:30 for that venue.

Now I use a DNS-210 with that same 800-watt amp, still set at ~ 9:30. Although smaller speaker area than the two 112's, it has clearer, better sound, is more sensitive, and is capable of much higher volume than the two 112's. I'd say without decent monitors you should look around 400-watts or so into either a good 210 or two 112's. A 212 would work too but that's probably just as big as your 410.

ALSO, no worries about trying to split your signal from your board to your amp and the FOH. If you're plugging it into the amp, just run the DI from the amp to the FOH. Set the DI to pre-EQ or post EQ (presuming your board comes in pre-EQ), whichever you like, and you'll get the same sound (or close to it) from both your amp and the FOH. If setting it to pre-EQ eliminates the sound-shaping from your board, then just set it to post-EQ and you'll be good to go!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BackendBear
You won't need an amp as long as you have a source to monitor yourself be it floor wedge or IEM
IMO
While I didn't mention in my post above, I played AMPLESS for almost 2 yrs (150+ gigs) using a pedal board with a [sound shaping] DI!!
I was IEM the whole time, so not lugging an amp to gigs, was nice!
 
Hopefully you have your rig setup on some sort of casterboard or dolly. Before your set, your entire rig should be setup and patched, ready to go. When it's time, you roll your rig on stage, plug into the PA, set down your bass and bass stand, plug in your bass, tune, and your ready to rock.

I did most of my professional career with a 210 and approximately 250-400W and this was plenty for all but the loudest stadium gigs where gigantic side fills were provided. Under those circumstances I found it was best to turn my amp down so it didn't fight with the side fills.

My amp serves as my personal monitor, so it was not intended to fill the venue or stage with sound. Most of the time I used at least one speaker that was elevated to about waist level. When it was just a 210, it sat vertically on top of my rolling rack and had an extra DI wedged under the front edge to tilt it back and aim the speaker at my head. The whole idea is to make it possible for me to hear clearly while running my amp at the lowest possible level.

In my experience, putting bass in your foldback monitor is a crapshoot. Occasionally it can sound great, but most of the time the foldback monitor fights with your bass amp instead of integrating to produce a nice clear sound. The problem is monitors and bass speakers have different phase and group delay characteristics which can cause cancellation in the low end. It's also possible that the absolute phase is reversed, but I had a DI that allowed me to switch polarity, so this was not a problem for me.

I have also done a few gigs where I ran ampless and relied on foldback monitors. Having an amp gives you some degree of control over your sound. If you rely exclusively on the monitors, your experience is totally dependent on the quality of the provided gear, the skill of the audio techs, how attentive the audio techs are, and whether the audio techs are willing to give you what you want or not. I have been burned pretty bad running ampless when I relied on unfamiliar techs, so when possible I prefer to bring an amp. Having an amp allows me to adjust my stage volume and tone independently of the PA.

Regarding the need for your amp to provide sound for the front row. This is a mixed bag IMHO, but YMMV. First, if the PA can't send the bass to the audience in front of the stage, then it most likely will not be able to send the vocals in front of the stage, so the mix is going to suck period. Second, the need for you to balance is driven by the levels of the other instruments on stage. From the audio techs perspective the ideal situation is for their to be zero bleed from the stage. Obviously this is unrealistic since most bands use real drums. But guitars, bass, and keys all use amps and there is benefit in reducing the stage level of these instruments.

The problem is when you have two sound sources in separate locations, when the sound waves come together they will arrive at different phase angles, so you get irregular summing and cancellation that results in comb filtering. In order to reduce the effects of comb filtering, one of the sound sources needs to be significantly louder than the other.

Since the job of the PA is to deliver sound to the audience, ideally the PA should be the dominant sound source for as much of the audience chamber as possible. If the stage wash dominates in front of the stage, then the sound a few few back will be impacted significantly by comb filtering, because this will be the zone where the PA and the stage wash fights for dominance. IMHO better for the sound to be nice in this zone and allow the sound to suck in a zone that cannot be helped. Then again my rigs usually run front fills of an aux or matrix, so there is no dead zone.

My personal view if the PA is carrying all of the instruments: Amps serve as personal monitors and should be aimed consistent with this goal. I.E. the amp should be aimed to deliver sound primarily to whoever is playing through the amp. Theoretically this works because most people prefer to hear themselves louder in the mix than everyone else. So if you aim your amp at yourself and adjust it for a good balance, there is a better chance that everyone can get the desired level of "more me." Before turning on the PA, try to get a good acoustic balance where everyone's needs are met.

Foldback monitors should be used when you can't hear something you need to hear. For example if you can't hear the guitarist on the other side of the stage, then put a little guitar in your foldback monitor. Also, rather than cranking up your bass amp so everyone can hear it, have everyone put just enough bass in their monitor to suit their needs. Of course the problem is some people really like a lot of bass.

I will say running sound like this has worked really well when I am running a band, but it's not the way most people are used to doing it; so implementing this ideas sometimes faces resistance. Many people only think about how to get there own sound rather than how to best serve the audience's needs. They want to do things the way they have always done them and are resistant to trying new ideas. I try to take an approach that involves a compromise that ultimately serves everyone's needs instead of allowing one person's needs to dominate. Also, my belief is since the audience is our patron it's important to try and give them the best possible experience rather than focusing so much on our own needs and desires. I think many top professional musicians would agree with this philosophy.

You sir are my idol, thank you for this knowledge share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wasnex
What made you go back to using an amp?
Guitar player using a wedge, complaining he couldn't hear enough bass - even tho I can usually hear the venue subs at places we play - thru my IEM's!
Core band has been together for 7 yrs in June.. so <shrug> did it to keep everyone happy! It's an SVT7 and a 2x10 cab.. and now I leave the pedalboard behind.
 
The OP mentioned being on the bill with multiple other bands if thats the case I would want an amp and as simple as set up as I can, as the sound crew is not going to have a whole lot of time to do an in ears or monitor mix that is specific to one of the 10 bands..

I know I do an event in the summer where I have multiple bands, one drum kit, and I start with a basic monitor mix and then tweak it as I can, but it gets really tough if one group needs something special that I was not aware of prior to arriving on site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9
I always thought that the sound tech wanted a pre-eq signal from the bass so that he or she has somewhere to go with the mix..I understand the cab sim, which is cool..I would think that the simple route is to come out of what ever does the cab sim and one goes to your amp and the other to the FOH and he sends his back to the monitor if you need it..personally I don't use any monitors so I'm real easy for a sound guy..my rig is my monitor..It's a crazy new world in modeling and cab IR and all that...maybe I should take a look at that. Too bad they don't make a powered cab for bass to use with FX, kemper or whatever you are using that would be cool..