C'mon - how about one band of semi-para mid?I say skip the parametric...keep it simple and pure
hey James! That is really exciting, the new 1200 is BOSS sounding. Such an amazing power section. That is a fantastic platform to build off of.
My .02c? I have always wanted a desktop/lunchbox form factor head from you guys with the HBP-1 front end. That preamp is one of my favorites of all time, and as much as I dig the VTBP pre's, I just prefer the feature set on the HBP. So if it was an HBP1200 I'd be REAL excited.
As to whether its too much, I say absolutely not. Sure its a ton of power, but the headroom and tone is just fantastic. I use the 1200 with a 112 cab, for the tone, not the ultimate volume ceiling.
Our stock amps come with a DI that is switchable Pre- or Post EQ. We offer the Jensen Transformer as an option for the ultimate in isolation. Our DI sound great and these Amps don't have to be connected to speaker so they can be used as a tube DI as well as an amp.
Duly noted, and I do have several amps with that 1,200w module, so I am familiar with it (and like it!). The various heads with the 250 module do tend to vary a bit in terms of both real-world and on the bench performance, but for my personal needs, the VTBP-M-800D has always been plenty round, plenty full, plenty rich and plenty smooth, in addition to being plenty loud. YMMV, of course.
The amp was put together a week before NAMM so it has quite a few things that would not show up on the production model:A 1200W amp will sell. Please accept these comments related to the design based on my personal preferences.
- I don't like the knobs. All black would look classier.
- You use black screws to mount the screen and corners, why chrome for the badge mounting screws. The handle is fine with the hardware used.
- The badge is huge. It looks like it is blocking airflow. A better solution is needed, like that used on some of your other products.
- Then there's another large logo on the chassis, make this one smaller. It looks busy
- The model name, Bass 1200D is good.
- The line "Tube pre-amp/1200 watt Amp" is not necessary. Perhaps locate it on the back panel. The capitalization is inconsistent, why only "Tube" and "Amp". Watt should always be capatilized. If you want to highlight a preliminary amplifier, be consistent and use the term 1200W power amplifier. It looks more like it was there for the NAMM show.
- The power lamp would be better if it were located below or just to the right of the toggle switch. It looks isolated where it is.
- Is bass freq a high pass filter? If yes don't label it bass boost, call it HPF. Bass players know what that means.
- "Deep boost" can be simply "deep".
- Is the active input a special circuit or simply a pad. If it's a pad, label it as -15dB or whatever it is, but don't call it active.
I appreciate that this is a prototype and packaging is full of tradeoffs but attention to detail is important at all stages of the design.
View attachment 3006211
Demeter amps have not historically had a mute switch. I suppose some of that goes back to the original design being a rack mount preamp; where other features, such as mute and tuner out happened in other parts of the rack.Is there some reason not to have a mute switch?
I also would not add a comp. I normally say don't bother with semi parametric mids but the fully parametric EQ section on the HBP is glorious. I also dont think it needs as full featured of a efx loop (could omit the level controls and in/out switch for example) as most people are using pedals inline.
I do like the idea of an adjustable HPF, but dont think its a dealbreaker. Most people are happy enough to use their Fdeck or whatever they use for HPF. I know Mesa had good luck with adding one to their D800+ but its not like anyone I know would buy this head if it had an HPF and not if it doesnt.
* Fixed at 35hz. Adjustable 20hz-220hz. 24 dB per octave with phase switchWhat frequency range would you like? 12 or 24 dB per octave?
* Fixed at 35hz. Adjustable 35hz-220hz. 24 dB per octave with phase shift...
Phase "switch" instead of phase shift.Hi, Stumbo. To clarify, for the 24 dB/octave fixed + adjustable HPF, do you mean to suggest two 12 dB/octave filters, a la the fDeck HPF3 (which end up being 24 dB/octave below 35 Hz, 12 dB/octave in the user-adjustable part of the range)?
Also, can you elaborate on what you mean by "...with phase shift" in this case? I've got two different inklings, but am not sure that either is right.
For what it's worth, I'd like to be able to dial the HPF down to 28 or 30 Hz. I agree that one should be in place and, if it's going to be set low, then having it be fairly steep seems to make sense.
Ah -- to flip the phase of the signal by 180 degrees, yes?Phase "switch" instead of phase shift.