All good. But to be fair, I only failed at typing school - that typo was fixed within 2 minutes of posting. Let me know where to send the royalty check for unauthorized use of IMFO: if Spotify, I’ll send your $0.000000000000000000000012 royalty payment through Zelle to avoid the processing fees.
But the question, once corrected, is a valid one: doesn’t “related to, or juxtaposed against, some kind of harmony” cover pretty much anything a person might play? It’s kind of like saying “Heads and tails”. Also, isn’t a juxtaposition also a relation, just a sort of second level one?
Further, what’s the meaning of life, and does the little light really turn off when you close Schrödinger’s refrigerator?
But all such ontological abstractions aside, I agree that all approaches, whether organic relations (heads) or superimpositions (tails) can be justified, as long as what justifies them is actual intent. As Hal Galper once said in a week long piano masterclass I took with him back in 1989, “Your outside **** is only as good as your inside ****.” Truer words have seldom been spoken!
