or just use a MUTE on the nut ?????
Don't you ever play open strings?
or just use a MUTE on the nut ?????
Right ballpark?
I think so. Over the years (been floating my thumb since mid '80s) I am less fussy over resting on the adjacent string unless I am playing free strokes (Tirando). If playing for example rest strokes (Apoyando) on the G string I won't always mute D with the thumb - rather it will be muted by the plucking fingers coming to rest there combined with perhaps some left hand muting. But it is a very flexible technique with no hard and fast rules. The pressure can be varied over a wide range to get just the right balance between muting, feeling the tactile reference and noise-free movement. The position over the strings can be easily modified to change the angle of attack in the pluck.
But back to your question - yes it is important to develop an intuitive feel for the position of the thumb/hand over the strings. and referencing landmarks on your thumb is a solid approach. In time you will find you are able to totally disconnect and reconnect with perfect location, but for now just work on getting to know your own tactile reference points. In is also important to keep the bass in a constant relationship with your body and shoulders, so don't keep experiementing with different strap lengths - find the right length and stick with it.
...
I also realized that my “lump counting” (even once subconscious) as an indexing mechanism won’t be adequate for playing but is more an initial means to the ends of developing the broader, more generalized tactile feedback to which SteveCS alluded.
...
For the immediate future I would continue with the deliberate approach. It is a bit like young string players learning the spatial relationships between their bow arm and the instrument.
(Snipped)
The floating thumb offers a similar levels of freedom in your right hand as you break free from the anchored positions.
...
It's much like learning slide positions when I started the first of my six years of trombone back in 7th grade.
...
...
seemed to think that "floating" literally meant "floating in the air" and not touching anything.
...
Oh, me too -- especially when playing the E (and often A when using rest strokes) string where I don't need my thumb to mute anything. I love that relaxed feeling of my hand floating in the air and my fingers gently brushing across the string: It feels so relaxed and free. I mainly use the floating thumb when playing the D and G strings (and sometimes A).I can't speak for anyone else but it is not uncommon for my right hand to have no contact with anything other than the finger on the string when making a note - the whole hand is 'floating in the air'.
...
The comment you quoted was intended for anyone who thinks that the "floating thumb" refers to having your thumb "floating in the air" all the time.
...
Over the years (been floating my thumb since mid '80s) I am less fussy over resting on the adjacent string unless I am playing free strokes (Tirando). If playing for example rest strokes (Apoyando) on the G string I won't always mute D with the thumb - rather it will be muted by the plucking fingers coming to rest there combined with perhaps some left hand muting.
My best answer is "TBD".Is floating thumb (which is how I play) intrinsically as quick in moving from string to string as anchoring on the PU/E-String?
I watched some videos of PU/E-String anchor players today and they shifted from string to string very quickly; it was pretty impressive and it looked like less arm & hand mass was moving, or not moving as far. As a still-in-Method-Book-1 newb and an in-the-fourth-quarter-of-life individual I may not get to the point that any difference could possibly matter, but if it does and unacceptable downsides are absent, then on the chance I might get there, switching now would seem preferable to later! Thoughts?
IME there really is little to nothing in it - the faster one is the one you practice the most. As a floater of >35 years I've never felt the need to anchor to gain more speed.Is floating thumb (which is how I play) intrinsically as quick in moving from string to string as anchoring on the PU/E-String?
I watched some videos of PU/E-String anchor players today and they shifted from string to string very quickly; it was pretty impressive and it looked like less arm & hand mass was moving, or not moving as far. As a still-in-Method-Book-1 newb and an in-the-fourth-quarter-of-life individual I may not get to the point that any difference could possibly matter, but if it does and unacceptable downsides are absent, then on the chance I might get there, switching now would seem preferable to later! Thoughts?
How do you mute? I'd rather leave my thumb in one place, seems more natural but I don't know how to mute/prevent ringing strings.Coming at this from the upright bass player perspective I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Upright players almost always anchor their thumb under the edge of the fingerboard, and then they range across that whole fingerboard, that's something like twice the width of an electric bass fretboard (four string basses here).
Left hand mostly, like on upright. Sometimes right hand.How do you mute? I'd rather leave my thumb in one place, seems more natural but I don't know how to mute/prevent ringing strings.