Same experienceI know this for sure:
Every TE I've owned or played put out way more SPL than an amp with a similar power output.
It's like the horsepower wars of the 60's and 70's; very understated.
Same experienceI know this for sure:
Every TE I've owned or played put out way more SPL than an amp with a similar power output.
It's like the horsepower wars of the 60's and 70's; very understated.
View attachment 3150014 View attachment 3150013
Someone have an idea about when these were made?
It does say “made in England” on the back.
I Sold that combo to GC several years ago. ($225).I had one of these, bought new in 1997 or 1998. Not sure when they originated or how long they continued making them.
Sometimes the last 3 numbers indicate the yearly quarter followed by the year. eg: 201 would be second quarter of 2001.
There will likely be a sticker with the date and a QC signature inside the amp but you'll have to slide the chassis out to see it.
View attachment 5141444
Can't find details with this serial number. 500WCombo 2x10. Possibly Peavy?
Would like to know date made & is it Peavy?
Thanks, Pete
Thanks for your reply.
All I know now is that it's Peavey.. and that is effectively only a Brand name.
Looks like the history is.. Trace Elliot, then Gibson, then Peavey.
Are you saying that Gibson & Peavey are considered as "fake" TE?
In practice, it's a quality piece of kit regarding power, tones & reliability. (although it is very heavy)
Would be nice to actually get a date & place of manufacture for my amp.
Regards,
Pete
Thanks for your reply.
All I know now is that it's Peavey.. and that is effectively only a Brand name.
Looks like the history is.. Trace Elliot, then Gibson, then Peavey.
Are you saying that Gibson & Peavey are considered as "fake" TE?
In practice, it's a quality piece of kit regarding power, tones & reliability. (although it is very heavy)
Would be nice to actually get a date & place of manufacture for my amp.
Regards,
Pete
Looks like the history is.. Trace Elliot, then Gibson, then Peavey.
Are you saying that Gibson & Peavey are considered as "fake" TE?
Gibson's ownership was proving disastrous, and eventually Gibson gave up any pretense of Trace Elliot continuing as a manufacturer.
My impression is the TE Vellocette and Gold Tone amps are somewhat coveted, but I believe their OEM output transformers are/were fragile. After the output transformer fails and is replaced, I believe they are fairly reliable.
The Trace Elliot V8 was from the Gibson era and it pretty much has legendary/cult status. I own a V8 and the earlier V6 and they are voiced quite different. Both are rated for 400W. The V8 is a bit more transparent and versatile, but I would say it has more of a rocking tone. The V6 has huge, remarkable lows and is very sweet and polished sounding (HiFi). Hard to choose. I think if I did an AB test I would pick the V6, but I seem to grow bored with it quicker than the V8. So it's sort of a choice between immediate appeal and long contentment . Guess I better keep them both .
I can't speak to the reliability of the OTs, but I can definitely say that yes, the Velocette and Goldtone amps are coveted. They are fabulous amps.
I owned two 1995 original V-Type heads, and a V-Type rackmount preamp. My memory wants to say the V8 actually was made before the Gibson buyout, but I could be misremembering that. So far as I remember, the only new products that resulted from the Gibson purchase were the Goldtone amps, which were really just cosmetic makeovers of the Velocette amps, with the exception of the Super Goldtone GA-30RVH head and 2x10/2x12 cab—and actually that amp might have just been the Velocette Twin with a re-jiggered output section to be mono instead of stereo.
I also question whether or not the V6 was ever really capable of 400W. I know I've seen the schematics, but that was years ago. I don't know that the KT88 is actually capable of 66.67 W per tube. The old datasheets say 100 W per pair. Even the claimed 220 W of the original V-Type head may have been fudging the numbers a bit. Not that it really matters. The V-Type heads are more than capable of pushing enough air.
The V-Type is a very good sounding amp, but it's does not seem to have quite the same gestalt as the V6. It's one of my stronger 200W tube amps though.
I'm sure that the difference in the relationship between having six output tubes running at a high voltage with a bigger transformer has an effect.
I never experimented with tubes in my V-Types. I stuck with the original OEM tubes, because they worked for my needs. I did at one point buy a matched quad of VHT branded KT88s, but never needed to use them before I passed the two amps on, when I got to the point that lugging that much gear was just more than I could handle, anymore. The only thing I have left is the 1248H cab, and that only because it's too difficult to ship and I never found a local buyer for it. My plan is to one of these days get a 2x12 sealed cab of the right dimensions (I think the Mesa 2x12 Recto Horizontal cab is about right), transfer two of the drivers into it, store the other two for spares, and junk the cab.
OK guys.. this will be my last attempt here if no-one can help. I have some illustrations which may help. Current Circuit is how it's wired in my amp. There is no 110v to this circuit. 250W cct showing 110v supply.I have pics of UV cct & the current wiring in the amp.
Looking at pic 110v Lamp Supply.Buff colored cable from Sw13 is connected to second Buff colored cable (brown heat-shrink) & goes to the choke. Considering I have NO voltage supply to the cct, should I connect 110v i/p supply at this point?
I don't know which cable from the Tx is 110v as I don't know the color codes for those cables.
The amp works fine, but it would be cool to have the UV lamp operational.
Pete