Lightness of touch

The speed of your plucking has influence on how aggressive you sound.
Not how many notes but how fast each individual pluck is - the attack
Not as obvious as really digging in , but effective

I generally dial in aggression on my gear
I set my gain on the edge of distortion, so I can dig in a little and get some hair/fuzz on it
( a Genz Benz Streamliner helps )

I have enough difficulty plucky as accurately as I'd like
Don't want to add physical exertion to the equation

All of this is of course easier said than done...
practice, the eternal solution
Hah, that sounds just like how I learned getting a powerful sound out of a bass drum (I dabble in drums a bit too): getting the beater to the head with a higher velocity. Makes sense, and yes, practice practice practice.
 
It's a playing philosophy I also try to adhere to -- but in my experience, real world situations often won't allow me to play with as light a touch as I'd want. With a well-dialed in in-ear mix, it's no issue. But whenever I have to use external monitors, there's always some kind of volume battle going on with drums or keys. "Just turn up" is not really a solution after we've already gone through soundcheck, the drummer is then going nuts all of a sudden and the keys player thinks we need more left hand in the mix than usual. I don't want to be the culprit that messes it up even further, but there's always a kind of "right hand creep" happening. So the headroom I'd try to keep in reserve just goes poof.
The struggle is real!
 
My bass teacher (decades ago) instilled in me to pluck hard. Hand a bit closer to the bridge, to get a solid attack to the note. and to have more harmonic content for a richer more complex tone. Before that I was wet-noodle handing notes between the pickup and the neck.

Perhaps it is time for me to experiment with a different approach.
I have heard people espouse this approach. But I have also heard the opposite very often as well.

I have definitely lightened by attack, but it’s by no means light. But I had to. The tendinitis was killing me.

I am at a place where I feel like I have to still have a bit of intensity when plucking to really lock a groove. It’s muscle memory from decades of plucking pretty hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31HZ
I suspect the studio pros mostly use a light touch. Controlled and focused. Don't know how that would work on stage for rock.

Having "soft" hands and good relaxed technique helps. I'm trying to go lower action. I can still get a clear transient and dig in for some grind when needed. I'd say "light" is preference, but "soft" is good technique if that makes sense.

Check out this guy, super relaxed hands:



Great video. That’s an excellent demonstration of what we’re talking about . And it shows something else that often doesn’t get mentioned: that soft hands begin with soft shoulders. When you let your shoulders go completely limp the softness flows through to all other parts of the chain. It takes dedicated work to improve a long-established technique but SO rewarding to do it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bass Motifs
I’m not a big fan of the light touch trend. My goal is to try to emulate my double bass attack, and I get closest to that with a medium action and digging in with a lot of meat. Light touch and various other approaches are also in my repertoire.
DB is quite a physical instrument!

Something overlooked is that both hands are connected, and tension in one will travel to the other. I play violin too, and one teaching trick is to get students to play as lightly as possible on the left hand while still getting tone. Pretty quickly you realise you're over-pressing, and your playing becomes more fluid. Right hand technique is similar. Yes lots of "movement" but it's flowing rather than tense. Like pulling the string on plucked instruments? Moving through the stroke? Same with golf :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul New
I'm self-"taught" and play like lumberjack on steroids. Small amps, loud bands, not knowing better and also kind of liking that "digging" in sound. But this:


Convinced me to try it. I'll just get started on playing light and opening the volume up so the amp provides enough noise to not wear my hands out too fast. Because it sucks for endurance.

I also hate noisy players, all that sloppy string noise, buzz, etc, not for me. So I'll lower my action even more and get cranking. No wait, get touching.

Question for the lighthanded players: I've seen some very light touch players that had all that fundamental sound, but nothing energetic for me. That whole digging "aggression" seemed to have disappeared. What can I do to retain some of that? Compression and back to the heavy handedness? Hand position closer to the bridge and just a little more dig?
I typically play with a light touch because it allows me a wider range of dynamics, just by how had I pluck the strings. About the only time I really "dig-in" to the strings is when I want my '82 Jazz to growl. My '65 Jazz also used to growl but my '82 is both brighter and has more sustain than my '65 did, so it growls better. To make it growl, I'll dig into the strings right over the bridge pickup and it will growl all night long, but in a good way.

I'll also play back by the bridge pickup (by it not necessarily over it) when I want a brighter sound with more attack. That also makes it much easier to play those quick triplets, sixteenth notes, and galloping passages (for instance opening of Barracuda by Heart). Two things are happening when I do that: 1.) the brighter tone gives fast notes more clarity in the mix, and 2.) it's much easier to execute those faster sequences when you're playing with the higher string tension that you'll find that down by the bridge. I normally play between the neck and the neck pickup but will move my plucking hand around as needed to get the sound I want/need. Playing that opening galloping section of Barracuda between the neck pickup and the neck is much more difficult than back by the bridge because the string has much less tension there than it does at or behind the bridge pickup.
 
Gary Willis always says “have your headroom in your fingers” and this is what he means.
Sweet spot is good analogy.
👍

if i can play lighter for quieter parts/tunes and dig in for louder segments i'm playing in my sweet spot. sometimes (the gig, the circumstances) that might be difficult to achieve (my sweet spot), but i know i'm playing too hard when my speed and accuracy are compromised. so i make adjustments and go from there.

99% of others who pick up my instruments can't play lightly enough to avoid clank and buzz because of the low action.....confirming that i'm playing with a lighter touch than most.

i've definitely eased up over the years --- i have fewer hand and finger pains because i'm playing with a lighter touch.
 
Interestingly my Dead Band keeps trying to do an acoustic set but we have not been happy with it. This week the acoustic set was actually louder than our electric set, I realized that the lead guitarist, who is very good, plays softer and with more dynamics on elec, on acoustic he is playing much harder so he can hear himself
 
Interestingly my Dead Band keeps trying to do an acoustic set but we have not been happy with it. This week the acoustic set was actually louder than our electric set, I realized that the lead guitarist, who is very good, plays softer and with more dynamics on elec, on acoustic he is playing much harder so he can hear himself
Just get him to play his electric in clean mode for the acoustic sets. Problem solved.
 
I saw a comment from a well known player (can’t remember who it was now) who said “you might think you’re playing light but you’re probably not playing light enough”. It intrigued me. I play with a pretty light touch but I wondered if I could be playing even lighter. So I experimented. I turned my amp up REAL loud - like to the point where if I played normal it would blow out the windows 😎 - which forced me to play with the lightest touch imaginable. I was stunned. The tone I was getting was sensational. It had a thump to it that I don’t normally get. Counter-intuitive, I know, but it’s true. Gary Willis always says “have your headroom in your fingers” and this is what he means. I’m a believer and will work now towards lightening my touch even more. Interested to hear from others who have gone down this path.
What a great comment The great late Jaco Pastorius rested on that same theory that all the effects are in your fingers.
 
Totally depends on the sound that you want. Players like Flea or Geddy strike the strings pretty loud and play more through the string. So it sounds more aggressive and spikey with more attack in the sound. You don’t get that with a soft touch. Fusion players like Gary Willis advocate a light touch and sound more mellow and full. And there is everything in between.

If you play too light the notes also don’t sound clear.

For slapping you also need some attack, so a medium touch might be best. But if you want to sound like Louis Johnson you have to hit the strings really hard.

You have to do what sounds good to you and what fits your physics and style. It’s a compromise between sound and ergonomics. And also action and string gauge come into play. So there is no definite answer.
 
Last edited:
IMHO better to play in the Goldilocks zone. But what that really means is choosing the compromises that work best for you. My point is the amount of plucking force impacts a bunch of factors, and some of them work in opposite directions. I.E. you might have to give up a little of one desirable quality to get little more of different quality...
I certainly agree with this especially if you are playing many genres.

I see some very good players on YT who have a very light touch. One in particular who looks like he is barely even pressing with the fretting fingers. I suspect he has very low action. I couldn't do it.

I had a teacher way back who had callused finger tips. He could get great attack with a light touch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wasnex