I like the old necks on the P which was 1.75 (I think) and now you have to dig around and figure out which P bass has the old neck spacing and width.I miss the days when Fender had just 2 lines: Precision and Jazz.
I like the old necks on the P which was 1.75 (I think) and now you have to dig around and figure out which P bass has the old neck spacing and width.I miss the days when Fender had just 2 lines: Precision and Jazz.
The names have been changed to protect the innocent . Same old stuff .I miss the days when Fender had just 2 lines: Precision and Jazz.
I’ll contribute.I’d like to know which models you don’t have to remove the neck in order to adjust the truss rod…
They still pretty much do don't they, they just have near endless subcategories of the two. I've never tried to keep up with all the various branches of the two families, I just prefer a Jazz bass. If it's the right shape and has four strings I'll give it a spin.I miss the days when Fender had just 2 lines: Precision and Jazz.
In my formative years there were just those two, but both were available with maple or rosewood fretboards. It was all a bit overwhelming.I miss the days when Fender had just 2 lines: Precision and Jazz.
I’d like to know which models you don’t have to remove the neck in order to adjust the truss rod…
this just gave me a mild anxiety rush.This reminds me of the confusing times when my mother forgot that her Facebook wall wasn’t Google search.
They differ by features. Decide what features you want, and there you go. High mass bridge? Light weight tuners? Wide P bass neck or modern? Nitro finish or poly? Rounded edge fretboards? Rosewood fretboards? Preamp? Five strings? Dual humbuckers?
I just don’t get what the issue is.this just gave me a mild anxiety rush.
Screw Fender. They know how to make a good bass but withhold them and obscure them behind idiotic names, picking some perfect features and sticking them with dumb backwards facing vintage bull.
@Gusdfunk Just get a Warmoth custom tailored to your preferences.
Or be lazy like me and a lot of others and get a G&L. They’re everything good about the best Fenders and none of the dumb stuff like hidden truss rod access.
no.I just don’t get what the issue is.
Many people have no issue knowing exactly what Jolly Rancher they like best, but apparently some people look into the open package and start seizing, I guess, and then go buy Milk Duds.
Ha ha, I’d like to see them rename the “Squier” brand to “Precision by Fender” I think that would really help clarify thingsFender got jealous of all the confusion that Ernie Ball/Music Man and Sterling create on a regular basis with their model naming. Rather than confusing people with similar product names (that would be copying) Fender has taken the strategy of just overwhelming the consumer with so many choices that nobody understands their product offerings anymore. So, they've caught up. Good job, Fender!
no.
G&L is like Jolly Ranchers. Every one is delicious.
Fender is like Jelly Belly with random weird crap like Pizza and Chili Dog flavored beans tossed in the same bag as the Watermelon, Grape, etc. sweet flavors. Does anybody actually want non-rolled fingerboard edges? No, but Fender (and by extension the used market) will still charge you over $1k for them.