Long shot: Anyone here work for Fender (Corporate)?

I’ve applied to a few jobs at Fender this year, but I don’t think my resume is getting past the bots. I have a background in Accounting, and there’s a position posted that would be my dream job. 25 years Accounting experience, and 35 years playing Fender guitars, basses, and amps. (My resume doesn’t express my interest in the industry or the company.)

If anyone could bump my resume past the bots to the recruiter, it would be massively appreciated! I’d love to discuss with the recruiter how not only am I a great fit for the position, but also my background with Fender instruments, and how much a job at the company would mean to me. :)
Thank heavens I’m retired and don’t have to deal with this. I don’t know if this is possible or productive for that matter, but have you ever thought about calling the HR department or arriving unannounced requesting an interview?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AltGrendel
It's not that the software is mean. It's software. It's dumb. It just does what it's told by humans who are overloaded with more applications than they could ever possibly sort through.

Obviously if you're working in the field you know way more about it than i do. But i can't discount what the other people i know in the industry have told me, and the absolute futility of searching for jobs that i've experienced in the past 15 years. It's really one of the most infuriating things. Recently had surgery on my sinuses. Recovering from that surgery was more enjoyable than job hunting. There's a long list of miserable things that, given the option, would choose over applying to jobs if they meant i could skip that part of the process.

Clearly i have a chip on my shoulder about this, and i'll shut up now because i genuinely don't want to sit here complaining about job hunting, especially since i have a job i really like, in music technology, that i got through a slightly arcane string of people in my personal network. Complaining online any more than i have isn't a good look and i'm in too good a mood for it. 🤔 😇😆
Yeah, it can look like your applications are going into a black hole because they kind of are. The internet opens up the possibility of an application from anyone in the world who has an interest, so you throw your hat into a ring of a few hundred hats and chances are someone else in there is better qualified. From the outside it’s very easy to say “the software screened me out” but I think that’s a pretty fast way to get into some kind of discriminatory legal issue or, in my side, lose good candidates because software is stupid. This is why networking is always best, that’s a big card in your favor vs being one of a few hundred applications that a recruiter really only has a few seconds to look over before moving on to the best one, getting to a meeting, or putting in some time actually sourcing and recruiting candidates who have not applied yet.
 
Thank heavens I’m retired and don’t have to deal with this. I don’t know if this is possible or productive for that matter, but have you ever thought about calling the HR department or arriving unannounced requesting an interview?
People usually discourage this but I actually hired a guy this way a long time ago. It can work if the company is hard up for candidates.
 
Back in 1995, fresh out of college, I could only get work by nepotism - literally knowing someone whose company was hiring, and having them vouch.
After about a decade in my industry I was able to get hired solely on the basis of my e-mailed resume.
Then the internet and algorithms happened to HR departments.
I've watched my wife try to get work post COVID and it's nigh impossible, even with her decades of experience in her industry.

I suspect the surest path to getting hired in 2024 is to go back to nepotism and personal networking.
Which, I guess the OP has concluded after all.
 
I do NOT work in the industry but do hire/interview in my field. Many places DO use AI to filter resumes/cover letters. The best advice is to mirror the "qualifications" and "requirements" language from the job posting in your cover letter. Literally, "during my 15 years experience in the industry, I have a demonstrated capacity to [insert requirement X, YZ] and have had tangible success in [insert requirements A, B, C]. I know I would be a great fit for your company due to my passions about [insert relevant info about company/industry] and my ability to [insert soft qualifications e.g. manage complex databases, successfully lead a team, etc.].
 
Yeah, it can look like your applications are going into a black hole because they kind of are. The internet opens up the possibility of an application from anyone in the world who has an interest, so you throw your hat into a ring of a few hundred hats and chances are someone else in there is better qualified. From the outside it’s very easy to say “the software screened me out” but I think that’s a pretty fast way to get into some kind of discriminatory legal issue or, in my side, lose good candidates because software is stupid. This is why networking is always best, that’s a big card in your favor vs being one of a few hundred applications that a recruiter really only has a few seconds to look over before moving on to the best one, getting to a meeting, or putting in some time actually sourcing and recruiting candidates who have not applied yet.
As I mentioned, at least in my line of work, the HR/recruiting software wall seems to block. I've heard nothing for weeks, often went perpetually on hold (until I just killed the application), while the ball started rolling rapidly when talking to anybody with an actual interest (tech leads, hiring manager). Actual offers once you make it past the HR/recruiting team hurdle.

I often get the idea that the filtering HR does just isn't good when it comes to roles where specific technical needs are required. As you said, networking has proven best in my experience as well. Once you get to talk to the people that have the need and knowledge of what they're looking for, things start moving. As if HR/recruiting (tooling) focuses on things that don't appear to matter as much in the bigger picture. It's unfortunate.
 
As I mentioned, at least in my line of work, the HR/recruiting software wall seems to block. I've heard nothing for weeks, often went perpetually on hold (until I just killed the application), while the ball started rolling rapidly when talking to anybody with an actual interest (tech leads, hiring manager). Actual offers once you make it past the HR/recruiting team hurdle.

I often get the idea that the filtering HR does just isn't good when it comes to roles where specific technical needs are required. As you said, networking has proven best in my experience as well. Once you get to talk to the people that have the need and knowledge of what they're looking for, things start moving. As if HR/recruiting (tooling) focuses on things that don't appear to matter as much in the bigger picture. It's unfortunate.
It can certainly feel that way from the outside because you don’t see the process and don’t know what you don’t know. Part of the recruiter’s job is to work tightly with the hiring manager/team to know what they are looking for, and the good ones understand their space very well.

Misses can certainly happen, but it’s important to understand that unless you know exactly what the candidate pool for that job looks like, and who else has expressed interest, it’s very hard to gauge your odds as an applicant.
 
Other thing I will mention is that many HR folks screening resumes/cover letters aren't exceedingly bright and do not necessarily "know" the industry. I have seen many applicants with relevant experience get passed over by the HR screen because the applicant simply assumed that the HR folks would know he or she had x, y, or z skills based on the nature of their past work experience/title. You literally need to spell out your precise skills and capabilities for them.
 
the best advice is to mirror the "qualifications" and "requirements" language from the job posting in your cover letter.
Yes I think this is true
It sucks that we can't rely on a human being just reading and understanding our resume
We have to customize keywords for software to ping on
Literally just copy the job posting and convert the pronouns to first person

Then there's that "white fonting" hack folks have put in their resumes...
strange days indeed.

All this "get past HR software filters" hackery is why I think we're back to "I know a guy..." nepotism.
 
Is there any chance to ingratiate yourself err network with industry professionals?

We have a small, local luthiers' trade show coming up in a couple of weekends. I'm not looking for work, but given admission is free to the general public, I think I'll go just to see what's out there.

The repair shop that is going to work on my broken bass amp is supposed to have a presence there. They're how I found out about it.

I'm in a completely different industry, and for a few years I've had somewhat the opposite problem: Recruiters on Linkedin see my resume and imagine I'm qualified for their job they want to hire for, even if it's really a pretty laughable non-fit, and message me about it.

That's not because I'm special, it's because they usually get paid whether I end up being a good fit or not (presumably, anyway).

In some cases, I'm pretty sure it's a bot/script/AI vs. an actual human recruiter. I had very odd email exchanges with one. A week later, I would get another message from a different "recruiter" with another almost-but-couldn't-quite-be-sure, made-up sounding name. After a while, I stopped paying attention.
 
Last edited:
All this "get past HR software filters" hackery is why I think we're back to "I know a guy..." nepotism.

Its not really nepotism if it isn't someone related to a current employee. Companies get bombarded with fake and poopy resumes these days. Our last recruitment, 35% of the applicants did not have the minimal qualifications posted and some were applying for a different job entirely. If someone in your company "knows a guy" that is looking and can vouch for them that at least gives that candidate some added credibility and makes it easier to pass them on to the first round of in depth review or interview, depending on how lengthy the process is. I would never hire someone solely because they "knew a guy," but an internal reference is an extra data point and may at least get you into the pool. Nearly all of the jobs I have gotten were because I "knew a guy"--and I am not a social extrovert by any means. I must have applied to 1 place 10 times and got crickets. Met someone who worked there at a networking event and we knew some folks in common, traded referrals, and when they had another opening, he called me and I got an interview. Current role I have is because I worked with someone in the office at a previous place and she was able to get me to the head of the line. It was still a competitive interview pool, but made the decision of the higher ups much easier knowing that my current boss had worked with me before in another role and wanted to work with me again.

Thats just the way the world works. You need some kind of "in."
 
  • Like
Reactions: mambo4
Here in the UK (and Europe) our CVs tend to be quite a bit more filled out and explaining than the equivalent US CVs (or Resume as you call them) - a decent descriptive CV and a cover letter bespoke for the job you want makes sense and really isn't too much work if it pays off.

Consider yourself lucky, I'm a graphic designer, and have to have a folio ready and be able to tailor it for different roles!
 
It can certainly feel that way from the outside because you don’t see the process and don’t know what you don’t know. Part of the recruiter’s job is to work tightly with the hiring manager/team to know what they are looking for, and the good ones understand their space very well.

Misses can certainly happen, but it’s important to understand that unless you know exactly what the candidate pool for that job looks like, and who else has expressed interest, it’s very hard to gauge your odds as an applicant.
I work in a fairly specific subfield with a lot of relevant and varied experience. Hiring managers usually want to at least talk, but the HR filter seems to not work too well. I very strongly prefer the networking route because of that.
 
I work in a fairly specific subfield with a lot of relevant and varied experience. Hiring managers usually want to at least talk, but the HR filter seems to not work too well. I very strongly prefer the networking route because of that.
I mean, it might be working perfectly depending on various requirements and the managers in question.
 
Whether it's a filtering program or a person doing it key words are definitely noted in applications and submitted resumes. A few years ago when I was concerned about my employer losing our government contract I sent my resume to a handful of facilities management companies. My resume was clearly for facility manager as that was what I had been doing for 20+ years. I had included a "licenses and certifications" section towards the end of the resume. I included the fact that I had a master's electrician license, a boiler operator license and was certified in forklift and overhead crane safety training.
I got one offer for a facility manager interview. I got emails every day offering me electrician, boiler, forklift and crane operator positions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CompleteHack
I mean, it might be working perfectly depending on various requirements and the managers in question.
Not really. If you have a variety of essentially the same roles that I fit extremely well in open in your organization, recruiters can't even be approached and internal people are scratching their heads why nothing moves and I get offers for the same roles in other organizations, but you haven't even had the decency to have the system send a "no thanks" email after a week or two of inaction, we might be looking at an organizational problem.

Or some internal people needed to get their PERM labor bits approved for the green card process, so there were fake openings? Who knows.

I'm going the connection route and if I ever need or want to move in the future, I'll look for connections first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CompleteHack
I have interviewed hundred of people in my company (almost 25 years already ) We do have some nepotism with children of our employees and it has a basis why. Many of them are aware of how our company works and if they they hate it, they probably will not apply anyway. It usually works, those children already know the acronyms and probably smarter than their parents. But you cannot work in the same team or department as your parents or partners or lovers. If they find out they will move you, no arguments or exception.
I was almost let go a few times, due to company restructuring or project cancellations, as part of the severance, they offered me to have a job hunting consultation which I took, applied what I learned and oh boy, I got so many interviews that led to offers, I almost took one but COVID happened and almost double my salary but meant relocating.

Here's what I learned:

1- In Linked in , have at least 500 connections. I avoided Linkedin previously, but once I reached that number, the system put me in a different list
2- Write articles or essays in Linked In and other online sites.
3- If the role that you want is public facing, clean up Facebook, Insta and X. I deactivated X
4- Your Linked In profile should almost read like your CV. Add skills in there and the order of listing your skills is important. Limit the work experience. Do not include your teen years working McDonalds. If it is classified like working for defense, tone it down but make it so that they will inquire.
5- Follow industry leaders but not necessarily the CEO's , maybe their tech leaders etc and if they engage with you the better. Follow also leaders in Glassdoor and other job hiring sites
6- Cold call (via messaging) peopl e that may hire you. They may not engage but pass on the information.
7- During the crucial job search period, consider a premium membership to get premium non junk headhunting leads
8- Have a resume consultant review your profile and resume
9- Register with other Headhunting sites like Glassdoor etc
10- Keep your Linkedin up to date

Even though we are a technical company, we probably weigh the behavioral side as much. You will be working with people., however technical the field is. Also, anyone can list a litany of work experiences but we will look for your impact. Consider this, I wrote a program with 1 million lines of code versus I wrote an application that improved warehouse logistics by 20% in the first year versus I wrote an application that was well received by the warehouse team due to the usability and improved productivity by 20% and contributing to sales increase of 3%.

You can tell me how to architect networking code, but I'll be more interested, how you will solve the problem at hand and you will work to find the solution - because it may not be a networking technology problem tat all. I have a few questions canned for these kinds of bigger picture. I use to be very technology specific when I was younger like I will ask people to write on a white board a Bayesian probability model in C++, but that doesn't really benefit anyone except my own ego as an interviewer. With chatbots and the new things they teach now, I will look for problem solving skills and their decision process more than anything else.

Lastly we look at the persons values ( no religious or political by the way). But I am not HR and not the hiring manager to make the decision. I really do not know that other side . I can only make a recommendation who to hire.

Anyway good luck. Keep on trying
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mambo4
  • Like
Reactions: LastJaguar