New and shiny or aged relic? Classic 50s vs Road Worn P Bass Poll

Shiny and new or Road Worn?

  • Classic 50s Shiny and new

    Votes: 257 67.5%
  • Road Worn 50s relic

    Votes: 124 32.5%

  • Total voters
    381
This level of pretentiousness over whether finish wear is “real” or not among a group of primarily hobbyist musicians is quite funny.

The only thing that really matters about a musical instrument is that you enjoy playing it: the rest is just fluff :thumbsup:
Perception is reality my friend. If you feel comfortable wearing a fake Rolex, go ahead. Most people I know worth their salt prefer to earn what they have.
 
Perception is reality my friend. If you feel comfortable wearing a fake Rolex, go ahead. Most people I know worth their salt prefer to earn what they have.

Throwing some logical fallacies on top of the pretentiousness, like the appeal to authority and anecdotal experience above, actually just makes it funnier ;)
 
Congrats on the pair.

So which one sounds better?!?

Exactly! If I were in your very fortunate position, I would put on a blindfold, have someone hand each of the basses to me, play each one for up to 5 minutes, and choose. Of course this is coming from someone who cares not one bit about the cosmetics of a musical instrument.
 
This level of pretentiousness over whether finish wear is “real” or not among a group of primarily hobbyist musicians is quite funny
To flip the script pretentiousness is exactly what what a reliced bass IS "pretend wear" the finish wear is of course real but it is faux and the reality is it is not authentic wear. The OP asked the question, just sayin...
 
I actually vote to keep the RW. The nitro finish just feels so good, even if the relic looks a little fake.

I just found that my RW resonates so well. I've owned dozens of P-basses but my RW is actually my all time favorite, more than the US standards. Heck, I liked my RW Jazz at least as much as my Moollon, if not more so and it was half the cost.
 
shiny and new....put your own mojo on it. This is the bass I learned on....it's all me...

128520473_707383396852275_6266199038014749846_n.jpg
 
View attachment 4133178
I dinged my p bass’ body today while moving my amp. Now I like the RW look, but it honestly broke my heart in that moment seeing my “Pee” with that not-so-glaring fresh wound. It then dawned upon me that it was unrealistic to expect to keep a bass in pristine condition. Especially if you’re thumping on it everyday. At the end of it all, it’s important that we have instruments we enjoy playing with instead of worrying about its appearance. So if I was you I would go with the bass that speaks to you most. *I apologize if it seems like I’m intruding on your thread*

I have a Taylor 510 Dreadnaught that a girl I was giving lesson to hit the spruce to about 3” from the bridge with the tuning guitar on her guitar. It left a small crease 1/4” long but not real deep, but enough to cause the value drop by about a thousand dollars.
 
They are both keepers but since I owned a Roadworn I would keep it, the look and feel and solid tone is unbelievable, it is one bass I regret selling. Should you keep the new shiny looking one and like the Roadworn look it will take you decades to achieve that look and you may never get there since it's a poly finish, and if you decide to relic it yourself it would be a disaster and look obvious, either way they are both great basses and whichever you keep is a win win!!!
That's what I'm saying, why either or, and unless you've actually owned one what good is the opinion anyway, on top of the fact, this topic has been done to death... .....!!!!
 
I actually vote to keep the RW. The nitro finish just feels so good, even if the relic looks a little fake.

I just found that my RW resonates so well. I've owned dozens of P-basses but my RW is actually my all time favorite, more than the US standards. Heck, I liked my RW Jazz at least as much as my Moollon, if not more so and it was half the cost.
Yes!...I think there is a drying process for the bass that really gives it its own sound and feel, its about the whole mfg process. I love mine, and with flats..baby!
 
To flip the script pretentiousness is exactly what what a reliced bass IS "pretend wear" the finish wear is of course real but it is faux and the reality is it is not authentic wear. The OP asked the question, just sayin...

“Pretentious” and “pretend” actually aren’t synonyms.

Regardless: watching a group of hobbyist musicians talk down to another group of musicians, a group which also includes professional musicians, and call them things like “posers” for their choice of instrument finish is just funny for some pretty obvious reasons ;)
 
Hi all, I love the look and tone of the 50s p bass. I did all my research, read the reviews, read the talkbass forums, and the conclusion was, for my price range, the best bang for the buck was the Road Worn 50s P bass with the Classic 50s P a close second. A few months ago I purchased a used 2016 Road Worn 50s P. It's a great bass, and I love a good looking relic, however part of me kept thinking shiny and new. A 2018 classic 50s P bass came up on Reverb and I jumped on it. Its in like new condition, not a ding or blemish. Both are fantastic basses and to my ears, I can't tell any difference in sound. Other than the coating and pickups, they are identical.

I can't afford to keep both.

The issue I have with the RW is that its not my wear and tear, and all other RW basses have the same wear and tear. Hmm, I thought I would love it but it just seems fake to me. And hasn't really felt like "my bass" if that makes sense. If I want a 50s replica, do I go with shiny and new or faked worn?

So for anyone else who had both, what was your preference?

View attachment 4132905View attachment 4132906View attachment 4132907View attachment 4132909
I like the way nitro ages better than poly. But you like shiny and it's your bass.

I think the RW will hold or possibly increase in value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
I never understood the concept of purchasing a brand new instrument for a few thousand dollars that a factory laborer in Mexico has worked hard on to make it look beat up. This is the ultimate musical fakery.

Hang it on a wall, make-believe its an old guitar. Make sure you get the "Fender Musical Instruments" baked metal sign to hang next to it on the wall. Bonus if a relic guitar never plays live, for fear of it getting "dinged up." Lol.
I never understood the concept of criticizing other people's tastes.

OP, keep both!
 
I agree with the posts that say to find some way to keep both, at least for awhile. Maybe over the long term you'll find yourself drawn to one over the other, and then you can decide if you still need to sell the other.

As far as the relic/fake wear thing goes...I bought my Roadworn Jazz based on the reputation they had for being great basses, and I liked the fact that I could get one in Fiesta Red. The vintage specs and already-broken-in feel were appealing too, and I can live with the relic look. It didn't dissappoint, and is the best Fender Jazz bass I've owned (I sold a Custom Shop '64 because it simply wasnt as good as the Roadworn). I decided to let the relic haters hate, and I would just enjoy my bass :bassist:

If it was a Classic Lacquer, I would take that. I found some of the RW to have been lighter in weight than the poly ones. Another factor I would consider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: odarellmc