Yes, but the math is the easy part.You can do the same thing that you do but in reverse, the same math that makes it easy to convert the longscales to medium and short scales makes it simple to convert a short scale to a long scale, you just have to deal with the extra neck dive and having the pickups in the wrong spots.
A 22 fret neck should work.
Yes it's definately not something you would want to do with an existing neck, although C extensions do exist on DB so a similar thing could work for extending the scale on a BG, but with bolt on necks the question becomes why.Yes, but the math is the easy part.
Functionally, to convert a 30" neck to 34" without moving the bridge, you would add two frets to the existing design AT THE HEADSTOCK.
Technically, you would end up around 33.7" scale.
You can do the math here:
Fret Position Calculator | stewmac.com
Understanding that, the important questions are:
1. How much might it cost?
2. If a direct-swap existed, would anybody buy it?
My guesses are:
1. Too much.
2. No.
The problem is the market is limited by the number of 30" bodies out there with a "standard" pocket and bridge placement vs. the absolute proliferation of 34" OEM builds in every shape and size.
The 32" conversion neck is only of interest because there are so many 34" "standard" bodies out there and the 32" OEM options in that scale length are VERY limited.
I just did the math on that, and I think you are right:
30" scale: distance from nut to 20th fret = 20.551"
34" scale: distance from 2nd fret to 22nd fret = 20.75"
Since you would probably need to enlarge the pocket a bit anyway, tweaking the heel a little is very doable.
According to Warmoth, P Bass® Deluxe, J Bass® Deluxe, P Bass® Special, P Bass® "Lyte" are 22 fret necks.
You may be on to something.
The longer scale neck will have wider fret placement. That means that the distance from the nut to the 12th fret will be longer than a short scale. The bridge must be located at a distance from the 12th fret that is equal to the distance from the nut to the twelfth. Since that nut-to-12th distance is longer, so the 12th-to-bridge distance must also be lengthened. Thus the need to move the bridge back. Otherwise everything but open strings will be out of tune, getting worse as you go up the neck.
Could we just sum up by saying this is a bad idea and should not be pursued?
i think yesCould we just sum up by saying this is a bad idea and should not be pursued?
Could we just sum up by saying this is a bad idea and should not be pursued?
This is a really bad idea.
Could we just sum up by saying this is a bad idea and should not be pursued?
The nut and saddles need to be roughly equidistant from the octave harmonic point/12th fret. If you put a longer neck on it, you're going to have to move the bridge outward, as well. By 2" or so. (assuming going from 30" to 34")I have a squier jazz shortscale bass and i want to convert it to longscale (i dont care if its worth it right now). Will this happen just by changing the neck to a longscale one or do i have to do more things to it?
Don't confuse the number of frets with the scale of the neck. A 24 inch neck made for a 34" scale bass will not work without moving the bridge.If it's a 30" scale bass and you're going to 34" scale, and the bridge cannot be set back farther, you'll need a 24 fret neck to seat the neck heel into the pocket far enough.
Thank you and thank you and as wise man Kilgore Trout once said, "If you can't spell it, its best you don't attempt it."