OP the discussion on increased complexity makes sense. What fails is your lazy syllogism that the complexity “must” make your tone worse. It simply is not a given that that is true.
I’m in the process of simplifying my setup. For me, that means stripping it down to essentials, like a tuner and maybe a specific effect if the song requires it.
Next on TalkCreativeBass...
Elwood Blues discusses:
Plain Dry Toast...AND Butter?
This!Disagree entirely. If I thought my bass sounded worse with pedals (or better without them), then I wouldn't use pedals.
I have specific needs for pedals: overdrive/distortion because I like it. Compression (sometimes) because along with dirt it allows my rig to sound much like a cranked SVT even at coffeehouse volume.
I joined a Cheap Trick tribute, so to simulate the 12-string thing I bought octave up and chorus. Sorry, I wasn't going to buy an actual 12-string bass. I think they are awesome, deep respect to those who play them, but restringing and tuning them is not my idea of fun. Besides, I'm a 5-string guy... need my low B, and have less-than-zero interest in 15 string.
And that's just me: others have the need to emulate quality synth bass, or simply enjoy the extra zazz from reverb, autowah, etc.
Now, I totally agree that complexity can come with cost. For me, I can easily get lost with programmable multi-fx. So, I go with what I know: analog pedals that do one thing (or range of things) well. Each pedal is like a color on a palette, I figure out how to blend them into pleasing colors. This has come from practice.
Sure, it's easy to get crap tones from pedals if you don't know what you're doing. So, the answer is to know what you're doing. It ain't rocket science. I could learn to use a Quad Cortex well if I really wanted to. I just prefer analog.
Last but not least: it's important to state that I'm not "fixing" the tones of my basses. I love every bass I own without processing, and that's how I play them at home (unless I'm learning a new effect). Processing is icing on the cake at the gig. And I have to add that I regularly get compliments on my effected tone from bandmates and bandleaders. That includes my most effected clangy Entwistle-like tones for hard rock.
Good thing, reduction is working for you. I'd just not asume, everybody else is just adding stuff in the desperate need to fix shortcomings introduced by the wish to destroy the perfect tone of the bass by addingen pedals in the first place. Most people add and remove according to their needs.Let’s talk about pedalboards and the endless pursuit of the perfect tone. Here’s my take: every single piece of gear you add to your pedalboard makes your setup exponentially more complicated.
Think about it—every knob on every pedal modifies your sound in a specific way. Now, multiply that by the number of knobs and switches on each pedal, and then multiply that by the number of pedals on your board. You’ve just created a system that’s orders of magnitude more complex than simply plugging directly into your amp—or, if you really need it, running through one or two well-chosen effects.
In the end, there’s no way your bass actually sounds better under all that complexity. What you’re really doing is chasing your tail, tweaking endlessly, and potentially masking the natural tone of your instrument.
I get it—buying gear is fun, and tweaking your sound is too. But personally, I’m moving in the opposite direction. Stripping things down to the essentials has helped me focus more on my playing and less on chasing a tone that may not even exist.
Sometimes, less is more. Simplicity gives you clarity, focus, and a sound that cuts through without getting bogged down in a maze of knobs and settings. So before you add that next pedal, ask yourself: Do I really need it?