Is this the correct capacitor?
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/WIMA/FKP3G024704J00JI00?qs=Udj8bnxwiisK7PSPkeqg6g==
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/WIMA/FKP3G024704J00JI00?qs=Udj8bnxwiisK7PSPkeqg6g==
I appreciate the critique about the lower cutout. I think I am pretty set on the aesthetics over potential comfort. 90+% of the time (even when playing seated), I use a strap as I like my bass fairly high on my body. Definitely not a low-slung metal player.
My bigger concern is that the lower horn is a potential weak spot, and could break off. So I am considering running the maple center piece in a diagonal to the top grain. This would give me some plywood like strength for that weak point.
As far a traditional P vs reverse P, we'll see. If someone can point me to some convincing resources that the difference is worth it (rather than vagaries of setup/strings/etc.) I would consider it. Also if there is a particular pickup besides the quarter pounder that's in the same budget, I'm open to suggestions.
I plan on using flats on this bass (probably the TI jazz set, although I've been impressed with the GHS flats on the EUB).
Materials update,
I can't find the 60mm sliders that I wanted anywhere, but I can find the 45mm version at Mouser, and they're only like $2 each. So that's going to be a minor change.
For those who understand such things, should I go with 500k or 250k resistance values? And what type of 0.47uF capacitor do I need to order? (I'm hoping to only make 1 Mouser order...)
Is this the correct capacitor?
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/WIMA/FKP3G024704J00JI00?qs=Udj8bnxwiisK7PSPkeqg6g==
If you've got a functional bass right now, you could set up a test rig that mounts the pickups above the strings. That way you could test both configurations to see what you like before you install them. Spoiler alert, I've done this on more than one P pickup and... (flame suit on) have not noticed much of a difference. Going from 1/4" below the strings to 3/16" below the strings was a more noticeable difference than swapping their positions.I appreciate the critique about the lower cutout. I think I am pretty set on the aesthetics over potential comfort. 90+% of the time (even when playing seated), I use a strap as I like my bass fairly high on my body. Definitely not a low-slung metal player.
My bigger concern is that the lower horn is a potential weak spot, and could break off. So I am considering running the maple center piece in a diagonal to the top grain. This would give me some plywood like strength for that weak point.
As far a traditional P vs reverse P, we'll see. If someone can point me to some convincing resources that the difference is worth it (rather than vagaries of setup/strings/etc.) I would consider it. Also if there is a particular pickup besides the quarter pounder that's in the same budget, I'm open to suggestions.
I plan on using flats on this bass (probably the TI jazz set, although I've been impressed with the GHS flats on the EUB).
Yikes that single mudbucker must sound like Billy Sheehan or Jack Bruce.I've always been very curious about the Nordstrand BigRig pickups. Supposedly a humbucker made from two 51P-style coils, so it would still fit the theme.
Also, you say Warwick, my brain goes "Jack Bruce!" and then I remember him playing this Gibson EB-1 which has a kinda similar vibe.
.... but we're not allowed to see it?flipped the pickup so the 3 pole piece is on top, with the traditional arrangement, and I really liked the look
.... but we're not allowed to see it?
This pleases me.
Proceed.
Listened to this video, and while the Labella's were my favorite soloed, the Rotosound 77s have a nice punch. The others seemed to be imitations of the sound that the 77s were 'just right'.
Think I'll start with a set of those and see where I go from there...
Roto flats were the first flats I ever tried, a VERY long time ago. They sounded great, but they feel extremely stiff. Food for thought.
Roto flats were the first flats I ever tried, a VERY long time ago. They sounded great, but they feel extremely stiff. Food for thought.