Things you've changed your mind about over time...

I used to think string-through the body was important. I now know it's utterly meaningless, and that's based on my own test with two basses that offered both options- so I strung one with the E and D STB and the A and G top-loaded, reversed it on the other. Did that for a couple of string changes and determined it makes no difference at all in sound or in feel.

JTE
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winfred
I was very close minded when it came to listening to music. Wouldn't listen to anything but metal. Now, I still only listen to metal, but I can appreciate other genres, and their impact on other genres.

Still not a fan of The Beatles, but I appreciate their impact on the recording industry and technologies.

I now enjoy a P.

Started on guitar, now enjoy bass more.

I still think I'm a horrible musician, haven't changed my mind on that one, yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winfred
Used to think 35" scale was mandatory for a solid B. Carvin and Wilkins changed my mind on that.

Used to think a Fender was the ultimate goal. Had a few. Meh. Moved on.

Used to think 'this will be the last band I'm in with a female singer'. Now on 4th female-fronted project in a row since that thought.

Used to not like stainless steel or light gauge strings. Now everything is light stainless except for the basses with flats (light as I can find them).

Used to think some songs were 'just to hard' to learn.
 
In my dotage, I'm much more conservative. Old tech is good tech to this old campaigner. I'm always open to compromise, the world has so much to offer, but the mantra, increasingly, is "Keep it simple" :laugh:
 
I am ready I would love to see a musician of today step from the pit and become the new Messiaen only modern day major composer of the 20th century I am aware of?

Ligeti? Penderecki? Xenakis? Just a few off the top of my head. Of course he was earlier, but I was a big Shostakovich fan as a kid before I ever started to listen to anything pop like The Moody Blues, Yes or The Who.

If it s the whole 20th century, then also consider Debussy, Dvorak, Hindemith and Britten. I find Messiaen forgettable by comparison but that's just me.

Otto
 
Played passive basses from the 80's to early 2000's. Then switched to active and thought I would never look back. May switch back to passive.
Got diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome in early 2011. It's been a humbling experience. I am thankful I can still play at all.
My musical view (genres) has definitely broadened the older I get. I never want to be that old guy that is stuck playing one style only and won't adapt.
 
Using a pick. I always looked down on pick players as not REAL bass players, but some of the BEST players alive today know how to use a pick and use it well. Don't know that I could do it all the time, but its a tool I need in my bag!
I always had due respect for pick players, and that was cemented a couple of years ago when I had an opportunity to sit six feet from Steve Swallow performing 90 minutes of very complex music, reading it all from notation and nailing every note. A tour de force.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjbassist
I used to think string-through the body was important. I now know it's utterly meaningless, and that's based on my own test with two basses that offered both options- so I strung one with the E and D STB and the A and G top-loaded, reversed it on the other. Did that for a couple of string changes and determined it makes no difference at all in sound or in feel.

JTE
A string through relieves string tension on the bridge. That is all. There is no difference in sound or feel because the string's vibration is between the nut and bridge saddles. This applies to both through and non-through.
 
Welcome to reality lol!
Yup lol... And when I realized that most amps on stage aren't even real, that changed my view completely! I know some bands that have amps backstage in a soundproof box with a mic in it... and the band I was talking about used combo amps too. In the end it's about the sound, not the look! (Although I still love my Ampeg rig haha)
 
A string through relieves string tension on the bridge. That is all. There is no difference in sound or feel because the string's vibration is between the nut and bridge saddles. This applies to both through and non-through.
Restrung my Jazz bass to top load to see if it would make a difference in the dead spot on the C# of the G string. It did. It didn't eliminate it, but it reduced it and adding a fat finger and swapping out to a high mass bridge pushed it back to Bb.
 
Here's one that was a bit of a major epiphany:

I was raised (by various music educators over the years) to believe that a professional musician should be so comprehensively equipped skills-wise that they can play any kind of music... a gig is a gig, and a pro is someone who Gets The Job Done, whether it's playing jazz standards on a yacht for a corporate fund-raising party, Broadway showtunes in the theater pit, post-Darmstadt total serialism in a Julliard recital hall, or Yoruba folk tunes at a coming-of-age ceremony in rural Nigeria. You're the bass player? You should know enough about music and be competant enough on your instrument and in your ears that you can do all of those gigs equally well.

And what I came to realize after about the first 20 years of working as a pro is that playing music is about so much more than just Playing The Right Notes At The Right Time. Playing music well requires understanding context and culture and history and ritual and how people integrate those things into their lives and how that integration has evolved over decades or centuries. Playing music well requires a connection to that integration that transcends the mechanics of simply extracting a tone from your instrument at a specific moment in time.

Sure, hand me the chart or give me a tape in advance and I'll show up to the gig and Play The Right Notes At The Right Time, because I'm a pro and pros Get The Job Done. But there are some musics that I have absolutely no connection to culturally, historically, ritually; they're simply not integrated into my being in any sense...and so regardless of whether I can make the notes happen at the right moment, I have absolutely no business playing any music that I am so disconnected from. It's disingenuous, and I'm doing a disservice to the audience by pretending that Getting The Job Done is the same thing as Making Music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Honch
I have read that the theory behind the string-through-body as opposed to top is that a longer length string frequency will take longer to decay than that of a shorter length string. Six string guitars such as the 1951 Telecaster and the 1959 Korina Flying V both were praised for better sustain. So the same theory was the approached when Fender and Gibson and other companies starter to build basses. Again the Physics Theory was the science behind the usage. So it must make a difference but, not a discernable enough to notice. Maybe some one can research this further Through patent information submitted by C L Fender in 1951 for his Telecaster guitar D164,227 is the design plan but I could not get any deeper in to find explanation for the string-through-body design. :)