I know we've discussed this before, but we all know how annoying searching this forum can be (especially with a group with this many posts). So, for anyone who's up for it, how would you rank the Thunderbird pickups you've used, and how would you describe each pickup's sound? Do that how you like, whether simple (lots of bass, no real high end) or wine-snob (Piney woods winter background noise low end, coppery-tasting low mids, fruity-smelling upper mids with a hint of Dagobah shimmer above the 17th fret). OK, maybe reign it in a bit from that. Keep it useful.
BUT... to help find things in the future, please include #tbird_pickups in your reply (not just quoted text - your reply!)
#tbird_pickups
1a) Original 64? Gibson p/u: I went in a bit skeptical, but they delivered. Full range, if you push them they get grindy. Something magical.
1b) 88-90 Greco p/u: Similar characteristics to #1 but can get even more grindy.
2) Thunderbuckers (TB66N and TB66S) in a VP: Similar characteristics to #1 but a bit more upper mids and highs. The 66S is the hottest on this list.
3-5) Basses I played at GTGs but can't recall which. Exact number unsure as well. Slacker.
--- The above were all fairly close.
6) Probucker 760s in a VP: Very full range, but lacking a bit of low end. More mids and highs than most pickups. #AngryPiano pickups.
7) EY Epi IV replacements: Very full range, a bit more lows than the 760s but not
quite as nice in the upper registers.
8) TB+ p/u in a CP: Fairly dark. Lots of low and lo mids with decent upper mids and highs.
9) TB+ p/u in an Epi IV: Same name, different form factor from CP pickups. Slightly darker, so may not be the same despite the name. Or that could be pot/cap values and/or pickup positions, etc.
None of these are bad pickups. Some are just great. All of this is my opinion, with 1a, 3-5 (hah!), 6, and 9 being from memory. 1b, 2, 7, and 8 were compared to prepare this list.