An auction of "James Jamerson Owned and Played 1961 Fender Precision Bass..."

Yowza! She's a real beauty, Kukulkan.
Thank you Sir, I don't have it anymore sold it a few months ago, it was time, I had it for over 28 years and got a great offer on it more than doubled what I payed, it was just sitting in my gun safe and I haven't been gigging for a few years now, I miss it but I have other basses that are just as good and even better, it was just that feeling of owning such a cool old axe that kept me hanging on to it for so long, I did gig it a lot when I first got it then as the years passed I started being Leary about gigging out with it, hopefully it's being taken care of and gigged so cool...
 
Thank you Sir, I don't have it anymore sold it a few months ago, it was time, I had it for over 28 years and got a great offer on it more than doubled what I payed, it was just sitting in my gun safe and I haven't been gigging for a few years now, I miss it but I have other basses that are just as good and even better, it was just that feeling of owning such a cool old axe that kept me hanging on to it for so long, I did gig it a lot when I first got it then as the years passed I started being Leary about gigging out with it, hopefully it's being taken care of and gigged so cool...
I still take my 64P everywhere, along with my 82RI-J. Just nothing else Id rather be with. Sold off everything else.
And fwiw, I think this auction is far too high risk, provenance way far away from credible.
OR....If the seller is so sure, give it (back) to these people: L to R, Son Joey, Ex-Wife, Daughter Penny. Cant remembers Momma's name.
JamersonFamily.jpg
 
I still take my 64P everywhere, along with my 82RI-J. Just nothing else Id rather be with. Sold off everything else.
And fwiw, I think this auction is far too high risk, provenance way far away from credible.
OR....If the seller is so sure, give it (back) to these people: L to R, Son Joey, Ex-Wife, Daughter Penny. Cant remembers Momma's name.
View attachment 1136244

Holy carp, that guy looks like his dad.
 
You know that beast just smells funky. I mean, funky as an old dive bar on Sunday morning. Probably smells of cigarettes, old booze, stale perfume and cheep weed. Definitely not for the faint hearted.

I have a 1980 G&L L2000E that pretty much fits that description. Found it in a pawnshop twenty years ago.
:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjmuckluckjr
OP photo is an amazing bass, James' or not.

I don't understand what's so amazing about it. The bridge string spacing is off, nut badly cut, and the action is a mile high and it's missing a knob. Maybe the pickups are especially great, otherwise it's just old.

I do own a pair of 75 year old parallel pliers (and have had them for 30 years), but what I love about them is that they are fantastic quality, not because they are old. Old and good is nice.

Now if this was Jameson's bass, then it's amazing.
 
Apparently, whoever is in charge of vintage musical instruments is not 100% on the ball or they'd have some more specific detail on the origin of manufacture and perhaps an appraisal or at least an evaluation by a qualified third party.

A truly credible auction house should do much more than they apparently have to establish provenance and validate the back-story.


I agree with all you say... that's what has me confused. How could a major outfit like Heritage be so stringent in one area and so ignorant in another? In auction parlance, 'maybe' just doesn't quite cut it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Double E
I don't understand what's so amazing about it. The bridge string spacing is off, nut badly cut, and the action is a mile high and it's missing a knob. Maybe the pickups are especially great, otherwise it's just old.

I do own a pair of 75 year old parallel pliers (and have had them for 30 years), but what I love about them is that they are fantastic quality, not because they are old. Old and good is nice.

Now if this was Jameson's bass, then it's amazing.

Action can be lowered easily with the bridge saddles and a truss rod adjustment. On a threaded bridge like this one, changing the string spacing is a matter of just pulling the string over to sit in the next thread groove with your finger. I don't see anything wrong with the way the nut is cut. A knob can be easily replaced. I don't know if this bass is a great player or not as is, but Leo designed all these things to be adjustable, so a good tech should be able to make this bass play great... Even if it needs a fret leveling, that's no big deal.
 
First of all, I LOVE this thread. It's amazing how people look at basses and minutiously confirm or debunk the authenticity. Very cool. What's weird to me, Hayes' letter states:
He never asked for it back and I continued to use it for years with his blessing.
If I borrow someone's bass I don't wait until he asks for it back. Especially if it's a legend like Jamerson. I'd call him and offer to give it back. If he then says "no you can keep it", keep it. Otherwise: give it back. Catch a plane from LA to Detroit and bring it back. Or get UPS to do it. Whatever: if you borrow something, give it back.

I don't understand what's so amazing about it. The bridge string spacing is off, nut badly cut, and the action is a mile high and it's missing a knob. Maybe the pickups are especially great, otherwise it's just old.

I do own a pair of 75 year old parallel pliers (and have had them for 30 years), but what I love about them is that they are fantastic quality, not because they are old. Old and good is nice.

Now if this was Jameson's bass, then it's amazing.
In my world the opposite is true. Why would it be extra amazing if it was ex-Jamerson? It doesn't give you any of JJ's playing quality, it probably doesn't sound more Motown-ish than any other good old Precision ánd it's very well possible he didn't use this bass a lot on any records since he loaned it to someone and he had a couple more basses.
The fact that it's worn, well-played and needs some repairs, now that makes a bass cool to me. It means it was played a lot, which probably means it's a good sounding and playing bass. I really don't understand why people complain about a vintage bass needing repairs. If I buy and old car, I expect it would have some dings and scratches here and there, maybe I need to replace some stuff, but that's logical. It's old. Things break on old stuff. Deal with it. If you want a mint condition '60s style Precision, get a new Custom Shop Fender or have a good luthier build you one. It's probably even cheaper than buying this bass. Plus, as mentioned by @The Bass Clef, everything that has to be fixed can be fixed. Easily. And then there's one non-original knob on it. So......?
 
It is a bit like the saying 'if the garden is good enough, why pretend there are fairies at the bottom of it?'.

In short I see a very nice early '60s P bass (though where is the hootenanny button?) with wacky action, but the Jamerson connection seems tenuous. It isn't the Funk Machine. A handful of scratchy black and white photos of some dude playing a similar sunburst P bass isn't 'evidence', and I don't buy the story of Jamerson simply giving it away to a guy that needed a bass on a gig. I thought the timeline of Jamerson's basses was pretty well understood, and I've never seen mention of him having a spare. Given that he never swapped strings it seems somewhat generous of him to simply give up a bass. Beyond that, a fair few '60s pickguards shed their tip on the treble side, because the plastic shrank over time.

Should it not be one or the other.....?
1. Dude selling a bass that's not his, 50 years after he borrowed it!
2. Dude saying it was Jamerson's, but it actually wasn't!

Take ya pick.....theft or false statements! If I'm the auctioneer, I'd find a way to put this dude under oath! No way he gets any 'proceeds', if he should at all, without any confirmation!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axstar
First of all, I LOVE this thread. It's amazing how people look at basses and minutiously confirm or debunk the authenticity. Very cool. What's weird to me, Hayes' letter states:

If I borrow someone's bass I don't wait until he asks for it back. Especially if it's a legend like Jamerson. I'd call him and offer to give it back. If he then says "no you can keep it", keep it. Otherwise: give it back. Catch a plane from LA to Detroit and bring it back. Or get UPS to do it. Whatever: if you borrow something, give it back.


In my world the opposite is true. Why would it be extra amazing if it was ex-Jamerson? It doesn't give you any of JJ's playing quality, it probably doesn't sound more Motown-ish than any other good old Precision ánd it's very well possible he didn't use this bass a lot on any records since he loaned it to someone and he had a couple more basses.
The fact that it's worn, well-played and needs some repairs, now that makes a bass cool to me. It means it was played a lot, which probably means it's a good sounding and playing bass. I really don't understand why people complain about a vintage bass needing repairs. If I buy and old car, I expect it would have some dings and scratches here and there, maybe I need to replace some stuff, but that's logical. It's old. Things break on old stuff. Deal with it. If you want a mint condition '60s style Precision, get a new Custom Shop Fender or have a good luthier build you one. It's probably even cheaper than buying this bass. Plus, as mentioned by @The Bass Clef, everything that has to be fixed can be fixed. Easily. And then there's one non-original knob on it. So......?

Being owned by a legend gives it some cache as an object of note in history, although more so if it had been the actual funk machine. But I would agree it does not make it a better bass for playing.