Ric5
Inactive
- Jan 29, 2008
- 29,773
- 30,319
- 5,141
- Disclosures
- I like 5, 8, 10, and 12 string basses
I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.Ive had two Rics and played a bunch more from various years. The necks were completely different on each. My 09 4003 has the best neck of all of them. Im not sure you can just pick a year and depend on the neck to be a certain size, they all seem to be a bit different.
Don’t listen to the enjoyer. They’re just regurgitating what they’ve heard from other enjoyers.Don’t listen to the haters, they are just regurgitating what they’ve heard from other haters.
Hit a nerve did i?Don’t listen to the enjoyer. They’re just regurgitating what they’ve heard from other enjoyers.
Apparently I did. Sounds good if you got that thin of skin good buddyHit a nerve did i?
You have earned an honored place on my ignore list. Thanks for helping me avoid wasting time on TB.
My 88 was a baseball bat with ZERO taper. My 09 is Goldilocks.I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.
The only consistency about Rics is the inconsistency.My 88 was a baseball bat with ZERO taper. My 09 is Goldilocks.
Interesting thoughts. I could get my hands on a Rickenbacker 4001 79 too and it seems to be in a good shape:
View attachment 4235844 View attachment 4235845 View attachment 4235846 View attachment 4235847 View attachment 4235848
I'm completely aware that bass will cost quite a bit more than a 4003 but i'm looking for a bass for life.
On the other hand this would be the 4003 i could get:
View attachment 4235850
Would it be possible and a good idea to grind the neck, so it's thinner?
I’d look for an early 4003, maybe ‘81 or ‘82. The ones I’ve played have thin necks and they are cheaper than the 4001s.
Don’t listen to the haters, they are just regurgitating what they’ve heard from other haters.
I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.
Of the 5 I've owned, my 77 4001 was the most comfortable. As long as you get one with a stable bridge and little to no fretboard separation, it should be solid for a very long time. Mine was. Its only real flaw was that it was noticeably quieter than my other basses. If I were going to get another 4001, though, I'd look for an 80. The ones I've played had slightly narrower and more rounded necks than my 77 did, which I found more comfortable.