Can't decide between Rickenbacker 4003 vs. 4001

Which is the right Bass for me?

  • 4003

    Votes: 30 50.0%
  • 4001

    Votes: 30 50.0%

  • Total voters
    60
If you want a slim neck Rickenbacker get a 2030 bass

rickenbacker-2030-Hamburg-1985-Jetglo-original.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: PWRL and GreyBeard
If it were me, I would choose playing comfort every time. I had a jazz bass deluxe 4 string that looked and sounded great but, had horrible neck dive. I always have to sing lead and backup. Having to deal with neck dive is just one too many.
 
Ive had two Rics and played a bunch more from various years. The necks were completely different on each. My 09 4003 has the best neck of all of them. Im not sure you can just pick a year and depend on the neck to be a certain size, they all seem to be a bit different.
I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.
My 88 was a baseball bat with ZERO taper. My 09 is Goldilocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Relsom
Interesting thoughts. I could get my hands on a Rickenbacker 4001 79 too and it seems to be in a good shape:


View attachment 4235844 View attachment 4235845 View attachment 4235846 View attachment 4235847 View attachment 4235848
I'm completely aware that bass will cost quite a bit more than a 4003 but i'm looking for a bass for life.


On the other hand this would be the 4003 i could get:

View attachment 4235850

Would it be possible and a good idea to grind the neck, so it's thinner?


The blue one is an Azureglo, I had a '78 Azureglo, those are not common and are worth some money, if had the choice I'd go for the Azureglo in a NY minute, it will only increase in value and WILL last a lifetime, there is a lot of Ric bashing here for some reason, every time someone like you starts a thread like yours there is always a chorus of people bashing them, worst bass made, bla bla bla, just ignore that stuff., they're usually disgruntled players who never took the time to get used to them or didn't try to set them up or something like that, or even are just regurgitating stuff they read. As far as a lot of dogs out there go, same with any bass, and it's usually just down to poor set up. That Azureglo looks to be in nice shape. I wouldn't touch a vintage bass neck, it will ruin the value.


My '79 4001:


Rickenbacker.jpg
 
Last edited:
I’d look for an early 4003, maybe ‘81 or ‘82. The ones I’ve played have thin necks and they are cheaper than the 4001s.

Don’t listen to the haters, they are just regurgitating what they’ve heard from other haters.


Yes, I had several early 80's 4001's and 4003's (they were available concurrently) and they had slim necks, my 85 does too. The early 4003's have split pickguards as the truss rod adjusters are at the body end, they're the same hairpin truss rods just reversed with bigger nuts and individual blocks, they're pretty rare nowadays for some reason.
 
Of the 5 I've owned, my 77 4001 was the most comfortable. As long as you get one with a stable bridge and little to no fretboard separation, it should be solid for a very long time. Mine was. Its only real flaw was that it was noticeably quieter than my other basses. If I were going to get another 4001, though, I'd look for an 80. The ones I've played had slightly narrower and more rounded necks than my 77 did, which I found more comfortable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
I agree in that a Ric is definitely a try before you buy bass, but I do think that most of the very early 4003s and most of the 4001s have thinner necks. I had a 2010 that was a baseball bat. I never got used to it and wound up selling it. My favorites were a '72 which I foolishly sold and an '81 which I foolishly sold.


I had a '72 factory fretless 4001, 4001FL that I foolishly sold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Criswell60
Of the 5 I've owned, my 77 4001 was the most comfortable. As long as you get one with a stable bridge and little to no fretboard separation, it should be solid for a very long time. Mine was. Its only real flaw was that it was noticeably quieter than my other basses. If I were going to get another 4001, though, I'd look for an 80. The ones I've played had slightly narrower and more rounded necks than my 77 did, which I found more comfortable.


My first Ric was a '77 mapleglo 4001 I bought brand new for 429.00 in Boston at E. U. Wurlitzer, was the best shop around until GC drove it out of business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PWRL