Dunlop Flatwounds...

Is Dunlop a bad company? Just say Yes or No. I did not think they were. Now, I am not too sure anymore.

BTW, I am not changing strings 2-3 times a week. Especially not if I had flatwounds strings on a bass.
 
Nothing wrong with Dunlop. Their nickel super brights are my go to string at the moment. Don’t let a rant by someone that temporarily went ‘Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs’ sway you. Haven’t tried their flatwounds yet, but there are next on my list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zach77
Is Dunlop a bad company? Just say Yes or No. I did not think they were. Now, I am not too sure anymore.

BTW, I am not changing strings 2-3 times a week. Especially not if I had flatwounds strings on a bass.
No, they are not a bad company by any means. They have been around since forever and do a great job with pretty much everything they make.
 
Skip the Dunlop strings. Here's why:

At 52 weeks per year, and changing your Dunlops about 2 to 3 times per week, comes out to 130 sets of strings (52 x 2.5). The street price for super brights 5 string sets range from $22 to $36 dollars. Cheapest is PittBull on eBay for $21.03 with free shipping*.

So let's take $22 per set. That represents $2,860 that Dunlop has to make up in retail sales for the free strings given to just one artist, not to mention the wastefulness and contribution to global warming (if that's your priority).

Now consider it's likely that one artist represents a fraction of the free strings given out, maybe 5%, then Dunlop needs to make up lost revenue and profit for about $60,000 every year from those that purchase their strings. That's just one avenue of the spiffs they give out.

So my take on it is that Dunlop is heavily into the free spiffs, and I'm significantly reluctant to subsidize other people who probably make more than I.

So, my recommendation is to move to another string manufacturer that you like, and let those that appear to be excessive on spiffs know that you oppose this form of marketing.

*= cheapest I found is actually Kiesel Guitars at $20 even, but they charge shipping unless you pick up in their store. Then, you are subjected to CA state income taxes if you are a non-resident.

This is ridiculous.

A) who changes flats 2 to 3 times a week?

B) sounds like somebody's butt-hurt about not getting free strings.

C) Dunlop flats are fantastic. OP, I'd say they're around Chromes on that chart, my set aren't broken in yet though.
 
This is ridiculous.

A) who changes flats 2 to 3 times a week?

B) sounds like somebody's butt-hurt about not getting free strings.

C) Dunlop flats are fantastic. OP, I'd say they're around Chromes on that chart, my set aren't broken in yet though.
LOL! Ya, A and B are my thoughts exactly. So is C when they're new, but they get quite dark and thumpy when dead, whereas Chromes to me maintain a little more ring than the Dunlops.
 
First of all, every string brand has a ton of endorsers. Second, it's easy to ignore the role that endorsers have in prototyping and refining products. When a company consistently works with musicians that they trust, they get good feedback on the products that they're developing, and problems with products tend to be fixed before the inevitable internet blow-up. A company that has good relationships with musicians who endorse their products makes better products. Third, my Dunlop flats sound awesome brand new and I'm curious to see how they age.
 
I've been a Chromes user for the past 8 years or so and have been using them on all of my basses.

Recently I decided to swap out the Chromes on my Atelier Z VM4 for a set of Dunlop Flatwounds and I was pleasantly surprised. The Dunlop flats seem to have similar characteristics as the Chromes in that they are under the brighter spectrum as far as flats go, almost roundwound like, but still retaining the bottom end. Definitely less tension compared to the Chromes which is a positive for me. The black silk ends look cool too!

Now, I've only had it for a couple of weeks so only time will tell how well the strings break in but I'm enjoying it so far!

I've added a couple of video recordings with the Dunlop flats in action for those who are interested to hear some sound samples.


 
Last edited:
I've been a Chromes user for the past 8 years or so and have been using them on all of my basses.

Recently I decided to swap out the Chromes on my Atelier Z VM4 for a set of Dunlop Flatwounds and I was pleasantly surprised. The Dunlop flats seem to have similar characteristics as the Chromes in that they are under the brighter spectrum as far as flats go, almost roundwound like, but still retaining the bottom end. Definitely less tension compared to the Chromes which is a positive for me. The black silk ends look cool too!

Now, I've only had it for a couple of weeks so only time will tell how well the strings break in but I'm enjoying it so far!

I've added a couple of video recordings with the Dunlop flats in action for those who are interested to hear some sound samples.



Your tone there is absolutely killer! Thanks man, sold!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zach77 and UHUglue
I've been a Chromes user for the past 8 years or so and have been using them on all of my basses.

Recently I decided to swap out the Chromes on my Atelier Z VM4 for a set of Dunlop Flatwounds and I was pleasantly surprised. The Dunlop flats seem to have similar characteristics as the Chromes in that they are under the brighter spectrum as far as flats go, almost roundwound like, but still retaining the bottom end. Definitely less tension compared to the Chromes which is a positive for me. The black silk ends look cool too!

Now, I've only had it for a couple of weeks so only time will tell how well the strings break in but I'm enjoying it so far!

I've added a couple of video recordings with the Dunlop flats in action for those who are interested to hear some sound samples.



They get quite thuddy as they break in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zach77 and UHUglue
They get quite thuddy as they break in.

Thanks Jimmy. I'm curious to know - do they still retain some of the brightness as they break in? I love that the Chromes never really lose out that top end zing even after a long time. Do the Dunlop flats have that characteristic as well?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
Thanks Jimmy. I'm curious to know - do they still retain some of the brightness as they break in? I love that the Chromes never really lose out that top end zing even after a long time. Does the Dunlop flats have that characteristic as well?
To a certain extent, but I think Chromes are probably a little brighter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UHUglue
Wow! Came here to learn about Dunlop Flats and got way more than I expected.

Dunlops are fantastic. Just feel luxurious under the fingers. I've played all three sets 40-100, 45-105, and 50-110 and all are excellent. The heavy set is very flexible and a great choice for anyone curious about the Jamerson gauges but don't want the high tension and stiffness. 40-100 is my favorite of the three and gets the closest to a "slightly stiffer TI" out of any other sets I've tested. FWIW TI's and Dunlops are my top two choices for flats. Both are sublime with slightly different characteristics. TI's have a unique midrange character that's unmatched.
 
Dunlops are fantastic. Just feel luxurious under the fingers. I've played all three sets 40-100, 45-105, and 50-110 and all are excellent. The heavy set is very flexible and a great choice for anyone curious about the Jamerson gauges but don't want the high tension and stiffness. 40-100 is my favorite of the three and gets the closest to a "slightly stiffer TI" out of any other sets I've tested. FWIW TI's and Dunlops are my top two choices for flats. Both are sublime with slightly different characteristics. TI's have a unique midrange character that's unmatched.
That's what I think too, except I hate TI's :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ross McLochness
That's what I think too, except I hate TI's :D

LOL... I've only come across two sets of strings that I would use the word "hate" for. What is it that you hate about TI's? Tension? Tone? Price? They aren't for everyone but when it comes to recording I haven't found a string that can compete with the TI's. Just naturally find their place in a mix with ease. Live I slightly prefer the Dunlops because they've got a little more resistance to them and a little thicker low end. I tend to dig in a little more from the adrenaline so it suits that situation better. I do think the Dunlops feel better under the fingers. Luxurious is the best term I've come across to describe their feel because there's something more to it than just the smoothness. Maybe it's the Goldilocks thing when it comes to tension and feel of Dunlop Flats...and really all of their strings in general..."but these strings were juuuuuusssssst right" :laugh: