I disagree with this statement. I am by far the worst musician in my band and I tell them this all the time. All the other members in my band are trained, jazz band or drum line etc. I am not. I taught myself how to play bass. Somehow they have kept me around and we continue to get bigger and better gigs. It works because I put the effort into not F up and we all get along with each other and enjoy each other's company.Any band, no matter pro or not is only as good as it's weakest member. Most bands will shed that person to improve as they should. Bands that don't, struggle to improve. That's always a tough thing to do when friends are involved.
Any band, no matter pro or not is only as good as it's weakest member. Most bands will shed that person to improve as they should. Bands that don't, struggle to improve. That's always a tough thing to do when friends are involved.
I’m MORE comfortable busting a buddy’s chops, than someone I only “work with”.It’s one of the reasons I don’t like playing with friends - when they screw up, no one wants to tell them where the Ursidae defecated in the buckwheat.
I think the difference might be in the definition of a weak link and perhaps differences in temporary vs long term bands as well. If you have, say a bass player who can't play Giant Steps but is an amazing songwriter. That might not be less desirable than a better player who can't write, sing, be the person they need off stage.There aren't many bosses in any business that will keep a substandard employee. To put the shoe on the other foot, sounds like some people here would just as soon have an OK player vs someone that is able to run concurrent with what their individual band has to offer. I totally agree with your "Ps". But again , the ability to be on at least an equal platform with the rest of the band is important as a new hire. It may take a couple of gigs to figure this out. Some even audition fine but, fall apart in front of a crowd. Then what?
As I've said, a band is only as good as it's weakest link. But, according to some that isn't so. If band "members" realize that a new drummer, guitar player, or whatever, is not what they need, they are supposed to keep him / her because they are all buddies or they are just a good guy? Not my choice at all. I have pretty broad shoulders and I believe what I believe through experience. I don't mind a difference of opinion.
Any band, no matter pro or not is only as good as it's weakest member. Most bands will shed that person to improve as they should. Bands that don't, struggle to improve. That's always a tough thing to do when friends are involved.
We’re not discussing a young/ fresh band.There aren't many bosses in any business that will keep a substandard employee. To put the shoe on the other foot, sounds like some people here would just as soon have an OK player vs someone that is able to run concurrent with what their individual band has to offer. I totally agree with your "Ps". But again , the ability to be on at least an equal platform with the rest of the band is important as a new hire. It may take a couple of gigs to figure this out. Some even audition fine but, fall apart in front of a crowd. Then what?
As I've said, a band is only as good as it's weakest link. But, according to some that isn't so. If band "members" realize that a new drummer, guitar player, or whatever, is not what they need, they are supposed to keep him / her because they are all buddies or they are just a good guy? Not my choice at all. I have pretty broad shoulders and I believe what I believe through experience. I don't mind a difference of opinion.
You should see some of the bosses I had then...There aren't many bosses in any business that will keep a substandard employee.
Amount of times in the music world of all genres I heard the simple advice of "be kind, it'll get you gigs" and I am shock to see some people struggle with that sadly. I can say for myself I rather take a guy who can play just well and is kind, a team member than a dude who is the best but is an a-hole. I feel I would struggle with the unkind jerk band member more down the road...To spell it out: this thread is about skill specifically, but there are MANY other qualities that go into being a great bandmate. I want to work with someone who is punctual, professional, prepared, personable, positive, polite... and those are just the P words.
That’s very rare. In 53 years I’ve heard “But he’s a good guy” or “But he’s a friend” exponentially more as an excuse for their bad behavior and shortcomings, rather than as a reason to hold them accountable.I’m MORE comfortable busting a buddy’s chops, than someone I only “work with”.
People do fear change, and many are adverse to conflict, and more are victims of their own indecision.That’s very rare. In 53 years I’ve heard “But he’s a good guy” or “But he’s a friend” exponentially more as an excuse for their bad behavior and shortcomings, rather than as a reason to hold them accountable.
That's why I said exponentially more rather than 100% of the time.I hear you but the opposite can be true, and often is.
Huh? Paul took over on bass permanently in January 1961, and they recorded their first album on February 11, 1963.Some bands are tight knit as friends and some aren't.
The Beatles switched bass players mid way through cutting an album.
Umm, who played bass for The Beatles after November, 1969?Huh? Paul took over on bass permanently in January 1961, and they recorded their first album on February 11, 1963.
lol clues everywhere!Umm, who played bass for The Beatles after November, 1969?