its an old saying, basically same as the different strokes saying
ok, what i meant was she may have learnt from the metronome what some others may learn from other means like playing along to records or whatever elseSo what can "different strokes" possibly have to do with Berlin stating:
"The true source of the effectiveness of metronomes can be found in music history by seeking out how musicians in the past state that they either taught or acquired time. Precedence takes place over opinion."?
I provided an example and I'd like to hear his take on it.
Here is an experiment for you to try!
Take the melody from Swan Lake. Play it in its original key of B minor. Learn from 0:07 to 0:33. Then play it on your bass. I predict that you won't do it correctly, not until you've learned the melody. A metronome has no bearing on time. Music does and it does for everybody.
Don't be offended by this next statement. I mean it to help.
You and most other people that state that whatever source of learning worked for them are in a delusion about what actually works. I've barely met even one person that made this statement that didn't instantly succumb to this fact when music was put into their way. I do this at clinics and it's fascinating to see when all bass players with this view, 100% of them, instantly struggle with both playing and time. Why? Because barely anyone has a time problem. It is another myth of bass education and the bass community. You don't have a problem with time. You have a problem with music.
I know that this statement opens up a lot of arguments that people might offer. But, opinions don't count. Music and the result of learning and playing it is the only thing that does count. Try learning the melody to Swan Lake and instantly notice how you won't do this with ease nor in time. But, if you keep at it, you WILL see an improvement in both time and playability of the melody. Then ask yourself how I predicted exactly your experience with learning this melody. I did because everybody learns the same way and we all share the same musical needs. Hence, "what works for me" is mostly a statement of a self taught player unaware of musical academic truth. The good news is that you whole musical thing can begin to change in an hour if you really wish it to.
Let me know how your experience with Swan Lake went.
I don't use a metronome to develop my sense of time. Sometimes, I'll use it to learn difficult orchestral passages. I might start by setting the metronome to 50 bpm, and playing the passage slowly. Then I will add 2 bpm until I get it up to speed, making sure that I play with the same articulation and phrasing at the slower tempos as I do with the faster tempos.
I also use a metronome to work out bowing exercises. For example, I might set the metronome to 100 bpm and play quarter notes with just the lower half of the bow. Then just the upper half. Then the middle, and finally, the whole bow. All the while trying to get the same dynamics and keep everything even. I find that using a metronome on this exercise forces me to not cheat.
What are your thoughts on these metronome techniques?
I would add, record your performance without the metronome, then play back your performance with the metronome on, to verify your time keeping.I use a metronome when, for example, I'm studying Bach, I first learn the piece without the metronome, then find a tempo where I can play the piece with good articulation, which is usually slower than I've been playing without the metronome. I will then increase the speed by a notch everyday or so until I've reached the point that I'm happy with my performance, then I'll play it without the metronome, taking care not to speed up. Works for me.
Well Carol Kaye specifically said in an interview that when she first started doing studio work that she was told she had a problem with her time which she specifically said was solved by using a metronome. I'm really interested in hearing a response from Mr. Jeff Berlin on this...
You can here it at time 10:00
I disagree because metronomic tempo is an artificial tempo. Players are aiming for a time sense that isn't real and therefore are aiming for something musical insupportable. People should stop viewing a metronome as mandatory in your playing of time because it isn't.I would add, record your performance without the metronome, then play back your performance with the metronome on, to verify your time keeping.
Excellent process!
Bach was never meant to be played in metronomic time for any reason of any kind. You should practice the music slowly until you have learned it well and then aim toward a tempo that you can play comfortably in. Almost everyone in history that played Bach did this.I use a metronome when, for example, I'm studying Bach, I first learn the piece without the metronome, then find a tempo where I can play the piece with good articulation, which is usually slower than I've been playing without the metronome. I will then increase the speed by a notch everyday or so until I've reached the point that I'm happy with my performance, then I'll play it without the metronome, taking care not to speed up. Works for me.
I can only suggest that if Carole addressed her tempo with a metronome, then she could have addressed it by paying attention to the time that the bands that she was playing in were producing. You don't end up one of history's top studio musicians by not being able to figure out how to play various versions of 4.
P.S. I read your rather snide comment regarding my not responding to your post. Realize that this kind of attitude isn't appreciated. I address as many posts as I deem important to address or if I get the chance to read them.
I think that if Carol had attempted to burn studio time trying to sort out her time feel issues using the band as a reference, she would have been quickly replaced. Rather than wasting other peoples time and money because of some misguided preconceived notion about the ineffectiveness of metronomes (which I'm sure never crossed her mind in the first place), she made the wise decision and chose to work out her issue at home, using a perfectly effective tool. It did the job and history was made. It's difficult to argue with success, in my opinion, and she was very forthcoming with how she achieved it. If your experience is different, so be it. I don't buy your logic, but then, I'm not obligated to.
Bach was never meant to be played in metronomic time for any reason of any kind. You should practice the music slowly until you have learned it well and then aim toward a tempo that you can play comfortably in. Almost everyone in history that played Bach did this.
About 25% of the dollar note, and the sum of the two dimes and nickel notes.How long is a quarter note?
You are going by commentary, not performance. You have adjusted your opinion by her thoughts, but not by her playing to where you noticed something in it that required attention. Every top bass player wanders slightly in the time. It will be difficult for you to find any C.K. performance at any time in her career where she recorded out of time to where her time was a detriment to anyone.I think that if Carol had attempted to burn studio time trying to sort out her time feel issues using the band as a reference, she would have been quickly replaced. Rather than wasting other peoples time and money because of some misguided preconceived notion about the ineffectiveness of metronomes (which I'm sure never crossed her mind in the first place), she made the wise decision and chose to work out her issue at home, using a perfectly effective tool. It did the job and history was made. It's difficult to argue with success, in my opinion, and she was very forthcoming with how she achieved it. If your experience is different, so be it. I don't buy your logic, but then, I'm not obligated to.
What makes this particular discussion interesting is how one bass player is now the benchmark for many to justify using a click. It is like the story that we heard regarding a guy, usually from Russia, who was purported to have smoked four packs of cigarettes a day since age ten and lived to be 112. This was supposed to show that not everyone gets lung cancer.In the video, Motown drummer Earl Palmer called CK out on her time, obviously comparing her feel to a benchmark he was familiar with - Jamerson.
Carol - who, incidentally hasn’t played on an studio album in decades, always had a stiff feel. If she did do metronome work, it didn’t seem to help. It’s there, and it worked well in some music, but it remained stiff. It’s fair to surmise that Jamerson, the legendary rightful source of the Motown sound, didn’t work too much with a metronome because he didn’t really practice, period.
I wish you guys would come up with more timely and informed ways to antagonize Jeff Berlin. It’s almost as if you guys are putting this on your resumes because there’s nothing else of regard to put on them.
About 25% of the dollar note, and the sum of the two dimes and nickel notes.