Proper way to merge.

I don't know what the proper way is but there's the way it works in the real world.

Every morning I take the Cross Island Parkway to the Long Island Expressway. The right lane is backed up a mile before the exit. You can sit on the line for ten minutes or do what me and other unafraid drivers do.

I pass them all and merge right at the end. I cut off hundreds of people and don't slow anyone down. I've been doing this successfully for eight years.

Others try the same thing and fear causes them to slam on their breaks at the last second. Then they sit in the right lane blocking anyone not getting off and hope someone will let them in.

What I do doesn't affect anyone else. What the fraidy cat does can cause accidents.

Sounds like your from Queens
 
One of the best feelings a truck driver can get is cutting off late mergers in the scenario laid out in the OP. No one can argue with a big @$$ tail lift or non-existent bumper that's head-high ready to decapitate those who don't want to be behind a truck.
 
As a person who drove a cab in NYC for a while, I absolutely hate Seattle traffic. I far prefer overtly aggressive to passive aggressive. It's one of the reasons I commute on a motorcycle. Lane splitting isn't legal here, but there are lots of times that some numb nut splays across traffic and fouls things up for everyone except me. I can squeeze around the dimwit, no problems. I have only had one person get enraged and try to kill me in about 20 years of what amounts to daily combat riding.
 
As a person who drove a cab in NYC for a while, I absolutely hate Seattle traffic. I far prefer overtly aggressive to passive aggressive. It's one of the reasons I commute on a motorcycle. Lane splitting isn't legal here, but there are lots of times that some numb nut splays across traffic and fouls things up for everyone except me. I can squeeze around the dimwit, no problems. I have only had one person get enraged and try to kill me in about 20 years of what amounts to daily combat riding.
Is it true that the most of the side view mirrors on NYC cabs are broken?
 
My question relates to major market/big urban area driving:
Why are the driving habits of today declining so drastically?

It's like a death defying demolition derby on some of our urban highways and off the highways at busy intersections, the red light runners have been getting progressively worse for years. Around here its not unusual to see 4 or 5 cars race thru a yellow>red light, knowing they are trying to beat the odds, and freeway driving is insane. And the people who race up to the front of a turn only lane, just to floorboard it when the light turns green, into the straight lane traffic and avoid the intersection delays need to be stripped of their drivers licenses. I'm not chalking any of that rudeness up to texting either. That's another issue. But it's a wonder road rage casualties aren't higher than they are.
 
My question relates to major market/big urban area driving:
Why are the driving habits of today declining so drastically?

It's like a death defying demolition derby on some of our urban highways and off the highways at busy intersections, the red light runners have been getting progressively worse for years. Around here its not unusual to see 4 or 5 cars race thru a yellow>red light, knowing they are trying to beat the odds, and freeway driving is insane. And the people who race up to the front of a turn only lane, just to floorboard it when the light turns green, into the straight lane traffic and avoid the intersection delays need to be stripped of their drivers licenses. I'm not chalking any of that rudeness up to texting either. That's another issue. But it's a wonder road rage casualties aren't higher than they are.
Because everyone is texting. Every single driver on the road. Except me.
 
I don't know what the proper way is but there's the way it works in the real world.

Every morning I take the Cross Island Parkway to the Long Island Expressway. The right lane is backed up a mile before the exit. You can sit on the line for ten minutes or do what me and other unafraid drivers do.

I pass them all and merge right at the end. I cut off hundreds of people and don't slow anyone down. I've been doing this successfully for eight years.

Others try the same thing and fear causes them to slam on their breaks at the last second. Then they sit in the right lane blocking anyone not getting off and hope someone will let them in.

What I do doesn't affect anyone else. What the fraidy cat does can cause accidents.

I guess that depends on the speed of the exiting line of those hundreds of cars. If they're moving at a decent rate then yeah, but if they're stacked pretty tight with any stop-and-go movement at all, then you and the other cutters are absolutely slowing everyone behind you down. Do you apply your "breaks" upon entering the exit lane?

But the OP is more about merging down because of a closed lane, though, and in that case the zipper merge would help to keep the unmerged lines moving more smoothly, but ultimately traffic will still move through the bottleneck at the same rate. So I don't see how it matters; you either get through in X minutes while moving slow and merging smoothly, or get through in the same number of minutes staying in one stop-and-go line that has to let the cutters in...

Oh, yeah, and I used to zoom ahead and cut in too. (This comment is about cutting into a lane that's waiting to exit, NOT about merging down into a single line.) I thought I was smart because I could maneuver into the space between cars which is almost always more than a car length. And I thought everyone in line was "afraid" and/or stupid... when I was a young punk. :p

And since I stopped doing it I have made it a personal crusade that guys like you will never take my spot. You might push me back one length by getting ahead of someone ahead of me, but you'll take my spot only with contact. Good luck. :thumbsup:
 
Guys you're supposed to use both lanes until the merge point. It's the only way to avoid multiple entry points and interruptions. In PA they put up signs that say to do this and still no one pays attention. I laugh so hard at people who get pissed about me doing this.
so drive up to the merge point at the same speed as the merge and watch it speed up, gaps getting bigger.
 
I learned to drive, and spent most of my life in a huge city in the US. Everyone except seniors jockeys for position, tries to save time at others' expense, and cuts off those with delusions of privilege.

Then I moved to a medium sized town in Canada. What a difference. People are relaxed and polite. Everyone zipper merges, and everyone else lets them; no one has high blood pressure.

Come to Canada--it's a kinder, gentler nation.
If you're Gorn and love New York driving, go to Toronto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Lee (QSC)
Honestly, that stuff happens, and it's why I like to leave a couple car's lengths of space in front of me, unless it's basically grid-locked. There's always that one guy, and it can be annoying, but honestly my job when driving is to get to point B, not to give other people a hard time getting there.

I learned to drive, and spent most of my life in a huge city in the US. Everyone except seniors jockeys for position, tries to save time at others' expense, and cuts off those with delusions of privilege.

Then I moved to a medium sized town in Canada. What a difference. People are relaxed and polite. Everyone zipper merges, and everyone else lets them; no one has high blood pressure.

Come to Canada--it's a kinder, gentler nation.
If you're Gorn and love New York driving, go to Toronto.

Plenty of crap drivers where I'm from, I don't think it's a Canada/US thing. I just try not to be "that guy" that's constantly jockeying for position, and I try not to accuse others anymore either - if 9/10 of us is fine 9/10 of the time, and you see a hundred drivers you're bound to find both the jockey and the good guy on that 1/10 of the time at least once (even with no statistical guarantee). I've decided it's better for myself to give the other person the benefit of the doubt, rather than accusing them of anything.
 
Last edited:
Personal crusades and trying to "discipline" other drivers is a big part of the problem.

Holding my place in a line waiting to exit instead of allowing someone to take advantage of me by stealing my spot because they're an opportunistic jerk is a "big problem"? How so, exactly? And how is that "disciplining" other drivers?

Do you stand aside at the supermarket allowing others to check out ahead of you, or do you stand near the person in front of you expecting to be served in order? If the latter, are you "disciplining" other shoppers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris Fitzgerald
Do you stand aside at the supermarket allowing others to check out ahead of you, or do you stand near the person in front of you expecting to be served in order? If the latter, are you "disciplining" other shoppers?

It was the thought of the supermarket analogy that finally put many driving conundrums in place for me. If there was a roped off double queue leading to one checkout lane in order to keep those waiting from blocking the aisles, then people would zipper merge without too much trouble because they are not anonymized by virtue of sitting inside a metal box that often has tinted glass.

But if there was only one line leading to the checkout and somebody rolled their cart right up to the front of a long line and tried to cut in, the people in line would scoff at the idea, and there would likely be a communal beat down if they tried to force the issue. For this reason, I never see this happen in a supermarket. But somehow, the perceived anonymity of a car changes that for some.

I think it comes down to the McNaughton "policeman at your elbow" rule in the end. If people think they can "get away with it", a certain percentage will do it. As someone mentioned, if there were cameras recording and ticketing illegal lane changes at exits, I think the number of people behaving this way would decrease substantially.

We had a situation here in Louisville where traffic was especially congested because of a bridge closing. On the remaining bridge, they made the right hand lane exit only and the remaining two lanes "no exit/thru lanes". People ignored the signs and clogged the thru traffic trying to exit at the last minute rather than wait in line. So the city installed plastic 3 foot high pylons attached to the road between the exit lane and the thru lanes. A few people decided to just run over these in order to cut over, and once the holes in the pylon line was made, other drivers would drive up to it and attempt to exit. It wasn't until the LPD stationed a traffic officer on the bridge during rush hour that people stopped trying to merge at the last minute.

Edit: Here's an arctile from the story above showing the city trying to solve the problem. It didn't work. The problem wasn't that people couldn't see the old dividers, but rather that they new there was no room for police cars parked on the bridge and that the likelihood of them getting busted for driving over the dividers was slight. Eventually the city posted traffic officers on foot and license plate cameras, and only that finally solved the problem.

Here's another with commentary about the failure of the strategy:
Screen Shot 2016-06-11 at 2.46.56 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Here's another common merging (or at least "merging-like") situation has causes me a lot of grief on a regular basis: Car A is on a freeway, approaching a typical cloverleaf-type of intersection, and wants to exit on the ramp just beyond the overpass. Car B is entering the highway from the ramp just before the overpass. Between the entrance and exit ramps is what is essentially an extra lane connecting them, which Car A wants to move into (to get to the exit ramp) and Car B wants to move out of (to merge onto the freeway). The timing is such that they will collide if one doesn't allow the other to cut in front of him. Who should do what? It's easy if both parties agree on the solution, but in my experience that only seems to happen about half the time.
 
Here's another common merging (or at least "merging-like") situation has causes me a lot of grief on a regular basis: Car A is on a freeway, approaching a typical cloverleaf-type of intersection, and wants to exit on the ramp just beyond the overpass. Car B is entering the highway from the ramp just before the overpass. Between the entrance and exit ramps is what is essentially an extra lane connecting them, which Car A wants to move into (to get to the exit ramp) and Car B wants to move out of (to merge onto the freeway). The timing is such that they will collide if one doesn't allow the other to cut in front of him. Who should do what? It's easy if both parties agree on the solution, but in my experience that only seems to happen about half the time.

Agree! That's a common one. AFAIK about all you can do is try to honestly gauge the speed of who is naturally going to arrive ahead if neither speeds up or slows down, but since the exiting car will usually be slowing down and the entering car usually speeding up, it's easy to see how the confusion happens.