Proper way to merge.

Between the entrance and exit ramps is what is essentially an extra lane connecting them, which Car A wants to move into (to get to the exit ramp) and Car B wants to move out of (to merge onto the freeway). The timing is such that they will collide if one doesn't allow the other to cut in front of him. Who should do what?

Car A should have his right turn signal ON in plenty of time for Car B to see it, ideally BEFORE Car B get to his Yield sign. I said "ideally" because we all know Car B will NOT look to see if anyone plans on taking the exit ramp.

Car B HAS THE YIELD SIGN AND SHOULD YIELD to Car A.

I know from experience how complicated this is for most drivers.

Summary:
Car A signals to alert Car B
Car B sees Car A's signal and slows down because he has the Yield sign
Car A takes the exit
Car B signals left and proceeds IF it's clear

No matter what else is going on around here, Car B is LAST IN LINE because of the Yield sign.
 
Here's another common merging (or at least "merging-like") situation has causes me a lot of grief on a regular basis: Car A is on a freeway, approaching a typical cloverleaf-type of intersection, and wants to exit on the ramp just beyond the overpass. Car B is entering the highway from the ramp just before the overpass. Between the entrance and exit ramps is what is essentially an extra lane connecting them, which Car A wants to move into (to get to the exit ramp) and Car B wants to move out of (to merge onto the freeway). The timing is such that they will collide if one doesn't allow the other to cut in front of him. Who should do what? It's easy if both parties agree on the solution, but in my experience that only seems to happen about half the time.
I believe those are called suicide ramps, and I don't think most modern highway planners are still designing interchanges that way.

If traffic is as thick as it always is around here, the zipper is easy to do (in theory), but if exiting from full highway speed, the entering car should probably yield if they can't judge each other and synch up
 
The trick is not to get wound up about some rude a hole. The trick is to be ready when they make their stupid move. You can spot aggressive drivers a mile away so when you see one be ready to be cut off or crowded and don't react in kind. Just be glad you are not the poor driver that will become the a holes victim.
 
I think I witnessed true genius the other night. I was on my way home in bumper to bumper traffic, driving in the right lane as I always do, when all of a sudden a car comes speeding past me in an even further-right lane that I didn't even know existed! I mean talk about a revelation! You know the one I mean: where the emergency vehicles park when there's a freeway accident, evidently you can drive there!! Here I was all this time thinking we had a measly two-lane freeway when we've actually got three! Why doesn't everyone do this!?!? Guys!!!

*lol*

In all seriousness, the highway I used to take into work allowed buses to drive up the side berm. Funny enough, traffic congestion wasn't super bad on that highway, though people drove like idiots on it. I saw very, very questionable lane change decisions on that road every day. I moved to the other side of the city and take a different route. While there is more traffic, people generally drive more reasonably on that route.

This is just my personal soapbox, but right ending lanes are really a result of poor civil planning, IMO. The idea of the right lane ending really goes against what we're taught about driving, at least in the U.S. If a road is narrowing to lesser lanes, the lanes should end from left to right, not right to left.
 
It was the thought of the supermarket analogy that finally put many driving conundrums in place for me. If there was a roped off double queue leading to one checkout lane in order to keep those waiting from blocking the aisles, then people would zipper merge without too much trouble because they are not anonymized by virtue of sitting inside a metal box that often has tinted glass.

But if there was only one line leading to the checkout and somebody rolled their cart right up to the front of a long line and tried to cut in, the people in line would scoff at the idea, and there would likely be a communal beat down if they tried to force the issue. For this reason, I never see this happen in a supermarket. But somehow, the perceived anonymity of a car changes that for some.

I think it comes down to the McNaughton "policeman at your elbow" rule in the end. If people think they can "get away with it", a certain percentage will do it. As someone mentioned, if there were cameras recording and ticketing illegal lane changes at exits, I think the number of people behaving this way would decrease substantially.

We had a situation here in Louisville where traffic was especially congested because of a bridge closing. On the remaining bridge, they made the right hand lane exit only and the remaining two lanes "no exit/thru lanes". People ignored the signs and clogged the thru traffic trying to exit at the last minute rather than wait in line. So the city installed plastic 3 foot high pylons attached to the road between the exit lane and the thru lanes. A few people decided to just run over these in order to cut over, and once the holes in the pylon line was made, other drivers would drive up to it and attempt to exit. It wasn't until the LPD stationed a traffic officer on the bridge during rush hour that people stopped trying to merge at the last minute.

Edit: Here's an arctile from the story above showing the city trying to solve the problem. It didn't work. The problem wasn't that people couldn't see the old dividers, but rather that they new there was no room for police cars parked on the bridge and that the likelihood of them getting busted for driving over the dividers was slight. Eventually the city posted traffic officers on foot and license plate cameras, and only that finally solved the problem.

Here's another with commentary about the failure of the strategy:
View attachment 885519
water, meet duck's back.
 
Cooperative alternate zipper merging is the most efficient and fairest way, but nobody can seem to figure it out in real life.

All the "nice" people try to merge way too early and cause multiple points of interruption that cause further slowdowns and leave the rest of the available ending lane open and unused.

And the people who wait to merge until the lane actually ends are presumed to be selfish jerkwads, so all the "nice" or "patient" people that got over too early block them out and cause that lane to come to a complete stop.

Add in the cumulative effect of exaggerated brake tapping and tailgating, and you have created a complete standstill a mile back from the point of merge.

It isn't that no one can figure it out... it is common sense .. too many people just don't care. It is all about them and their destination... If people just drove in a less selfish manner a lot of the road issues would not exist..
 
you're supposed to use all the lanes until they merge together, and then you're supposed to "zipper in", leaving room for the car in front to get over.

jamming up one lane into a parking lot, getting mad when somebody zooms past in the perfectly legit empty lane next to you, then not letting them in at the actual merge point is what slows everybody down.

(not talking about guys cheating by going in the shoulder lane or whatever, that probably isn't legal and also #$%& them.)

There are two ways to do it: this way, and the wrong way. ;)
 
I have a simple method of merging: be at least 5 MPH faster than anyone on the road. Then I only have to avoid rear-ending people in front, and it's hard for anyone behind me to be a problem.

And it gives me a wonderful excuse to make sure my car will still do 6500 RPM coming down the entrance ramp!!

But - I take the hole that's there. I will merge as early as the hole that appears, even a number of cars back. My goal is to make it smooth.

If it's merging when lanes reduce, I usually plan at least a mile ahead, slip past the slow cars, and find the spot to merge well before it's needed. The average driver is not thinking farther ahead than the rear bumper of the car in front of him/her. It's easy to plan around them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stewie26
Just South of Hagerstown Md. there is a merge from Halfway Blvd. onto I 81 North. The original ramp is two lanes that merge into one lane to enter the highway. Well before the merge is a sign that says "Alternate right of way." About 50 feet past that sign is another one that says "Take turns." Doesn't say much for the Hagerstown mentality. It does tend to run very smoothly though.
 
Just South of Hagerstown Md. there is a merge from Halfway Blvd. onto I 81 North. The original ramp is two lanes that merge into one lane to enter the highway. Well before the merge is a sign that says "Alternate right of way." About 50 feet past that sign is another one that says "Take turns." Doesn't say much for the Hagerstown mentality. It does tend to run very smoothly though.
it says to me there are genius sign makers in Hagerstown. If you aren't smart enough to read alternate you get the idiot version but 'alternate' reads legal instruction in a way that 'merge' or 'merge like a zip' do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris Fitzgerald
I got sideswiped Sunday by one of those who waits until the last second to merge. She didn't understand you have to wait until there isn't a car immediately to your left before you merge. She was convinced I was obligated to get out of her way. The police officer explained it to her as he wrote her a ticket.
 
The worst is the dude who sees an upcoming lane peeling off to transfer freeways and then basically parks in the now furthest right lane on a 4+ lane 65mph freeway. I see that one on my regular commute southbound pretty much 100% of the time, unless I'm going that way at like 10pm. Being tentative is typically more dangerous. Bad weather and visibility are the two exceptions I can think of.
 
It always goes more smoothly if people just alternate & don't try to get ahead.

I've looked in my mirror and seen people int he correct lane behind me get out of that lane and zoom ahead & expect me to let them in.
One guy was trying to force hi big pickup in--when there was no room, and I didn't back off as it woudl have been unsafe (Either the guy behind me would have rear ended me or the pickup would have clipped my front end.
He didn't seem happy so I kept an eye on him, when the road widened to two lanes he zoomed into the new lane (Which was fine--I was staying in the same lane to make a turn shortly up ahead.)
I suspected he woudl try something so I held back a bit--and sure enough he suddenly swung into my lane right ahead of me.
then zoomed off back into the other lane.

Proof he wasn't just in a hurry--he was trying to throw his weight around, intimidate people & get ahead.
For a few days after that I saw him ahead of me trying the same thing.

So it's how he drives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JFOC
I don't get it and I see it every day, there's 3 lanes that become 1 and there's always one car that merges last second, right where it becomes one lane. Why?!! It drives me insane!!
Two words: Zipper merge. In a perfect world, that is what is best.

I'm a binary thinker (everything is black and white, and if it isn't, it means I need to further break the issue down into smaller components until all components are black or white. It means I process things sort of in a "Mr. Spock" way.)

I love to ask people when is the best time to merge when you first see a "lane ends ahead" sign. It's amazing how married to their "squishy" answer people can be. Some say as soon as you see the sign. Others say when they see an opening. My response is black and white. If you are in the lane that ends, you merge at the end of the lane, and each car in your lane merges behind the car that the person in front of you merged in front of. I see the end of the lane as the place where the two sides of a zipper connect. The problem is that that is stressful for some people. They feel guilty for passing less assertive drivers in the lane they are about to merge into, or they are afraid that nobody is going to let them in.

This is the problem with our public roads: Unlike a race track, the drivers have grossly differing skill levels and reasons for being behind the wheel. And most think there way is the right way even though it may be steeped in ignorance. My ex-father in law honestly argued that people trying to merge onto a freeway are supposed to stop and then look for an opening and then take off and fill it. As he was telling me this, he was driving in the left lane on a freeway and we were approaching an on-ramp. There was a car about to merge in in front of us and he swore at the guy and sped up to cut him off. I was stunned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zontar
It always goes more smoothly if people just alternate & don't try to get ahead.

I've looked in my mirror and seen people int he correct lane behind me get out of that lane and zoom ahead & expect me to let them in.
One guy was trying to force hi big pickup in--when there was no room, and I didn't back off as it woudl have been unsafe (Either the guy behind me would have rear ended me or the pickup would have clipped my front end.
He didn't seem happy so I kept an eye on him, when the road widened to two lanes he zoomed into the new lane (Which was fine--I was staying in the same lane to make a turn shortly up ahead.)
I suspected he woudl try something so I held back a bit--and sure enough he suddenly swung into my lane right ahead of me.
then zoomed off back into the other lane.

Proof he wasn't just in a hurry--he was trying to throw his weight around, intimidate people & get ahead.
For a few days after that I saw him ahead of me trying the same thing.

So it's how he drives.
My wife says the size of the vehicle a man drives demonstrates the level of compensation they are attempting. I drive an FR-S. :D
 
Don't get me started on driving peevs. I've been a delivery driver at least part time all my life ... PA-NYC, Los Angeles, & now in and around Seattle. The zipper merge is the way it SHOULD be.

& I'm with Gorn here ... there's always some doofus looking at their phone or combing their hair when the traffic line finally moves ... plenty of room to slip in at the end without holding anybody up.



What's wrong with this? ^ it's fair and square.
You touch on why I left Seattle after driving there for 41 years. I just visited again, after being away for 5 years. Driving there was hell when I left, but they were able to significantly turn up the heat in the last five years. :D
 
I have done a total flip flop on this subject in my life.

I used to be the guy who gotad and did everything in my power to block those guys "jumping in line". I even got mad at others who let them in.

These days I am much more laid back. I just let pretty much anybody in and guitar worrying about it. It's not a race. We're not keeping score.

And if you didn't leave your house with enough time to allow for traffic, you are having a stupid day. And if you are having a stupid day, I would honestly rather have you in front of me where I can keep an eye on you than behind me where you can take me out while drinking coffee, doing your makeup and/or texting your besty.

Leave a few minutes earlier. Let the stupid guy/gal cut in. Go about your day with one less thing to worry about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robroy