One of the reasons I dislike Fender, the company…yeah, I'm about as serious as a Vegas wedding.

2645452155e82d74e1.gif
 
Lots of companies don't even offer sub-$1K basses. Of the ones that do, many don't offer matching heads.

If you'll kindly refer me to the many companies that offer you lots of matching head options under $1K I'll gladly refrain from asking the obvious question as to why this issue is specific to Fender (in your mind).
I agree for the most part. However, my main & only bass right now is a LTD Gabe Crisp PJ model. It has string thru body, no fret markers on fingerboard & matching head stock. It was $499 w/ a killer ESP gig bag but I got it for $399 because it was a demo.

IMG_3326.JPG
 
Like the price or not, the truth is Fender doesn’t frequently offer a matching headstock outside of its Custom Shop. Us matching headstock snobs have been fortunate over the last couple of years. We currently have the green Adam Clayton, purple Adam Clayton, the American Elite posted by @jd56hawk and the Noir P. Before that was the Opal J, 66 J and Hot Rod Red Jaguar. Not many at all considering how many models are currently in production.

On a side note, Surf Pearl looks much better in person. It has a subtle metallic hue to it that is super sharp.
 
Probably not, but what about the labor that it takes to tape it off and then paint it and clear coat it. Seriously, people should refrain from posting on subjects about which they have little knowledge.

Tape it off in under 2 minutes. Another 10 minutes to spay about 30 necks. This isn't brain surgery. They need to look at what's being done overseas, for 1/3 the cost. Leo was frugal and new how to cut cost. That legacy is long gone. He's rolling in his grave.
 
Last edited:
Dirk, (is that really you name?) ... I've been a professional musician for over 45-years and I still believe $2000 is the cut off for a serious instrument. ... If your cut off is $200 I respect that. But, don't pretend it's serious. ... Personally I'd like to promote to younger players to stop settling for cheap instruments and save your money for decent, well made instruments they'll play for a lifetime. ... North America is full of cheap instruments. ... You'd be happy here.

The difference between mass-produced and handmade instruments might have been bigger in the past, but modern production- especially on basses in the $1000-$2000 bracket- has narrowed the gap significantly. To the point that anyone even moderately handy with a screwdriver, some fine sandpaper and enough time to watch some tutorials could get their instrument to an equal quality.

I'd say that telling young players to buy $3000 instruments is bloody appalling advice! You know how much the cost of living has gone up in the past decade? I like a nice bass but I do prefer to eat. Anyone who thinks they need a $3000 bass for reasons other than custom specs is being taken for a ride. If you want one because you want something handcrafted, fine- but I wonder what on earth you think you're gaining apart from that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmt and blue4
Ullallah... it’s the same than painting the body with a very small surface to cover ... it should be paid of course but it should always be offered as an option at least ... look at what Marusczyk does for example ... beautiful Fender like instruments in general with a variety of pickups, electronics, body and headstock colours to choose from and prices are great ... being said from a Fender guy!

Fender has dipped a toe into custom orders with the Mod Shop. It's simply half-assed. Compare what you can do in the Mod Shop with what you can do with the Maruszczyk configurator. For something comparable, the Maruszczyk will be less expensive and the build quality is at least as good as the run of the mill MIA Fender.

Custom Shop | Public Peace

Fender is a big outfit with inflexible production flow. They just can't, or don't want, to do what the smaller more nimble makers do.
 
I think I’d go all in on matching headstocks if I were in your shoes. I wouldn’t know though, since my wife, awesome as she is, likely still thinks guitar and bass are the same thing.

My wife plays at the guitar some. One day we were at a store and she asked "Do you think we could find room for another guitar?", I responde "let me introduce myself."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ductapeman
I do love the look of the matching headstock, but I also work in a production machine shop, and I get the flexibility that not having to match head color to body color gives the assemblers-- basically they have to mate the neck and body first and then send them to Spray in such a fashion that they don't get separated-- it sure looks nice when they bother to do it, but I can easily see why it is a "special" deal on the better instruments. Lucky for me I have no fashion sense, and get along fine with nakey head stocks--
 
Like the price or not, the truth is Fender doesn’t frequently offer a matching headstock outside of its Custom Shop. Us matching headstock snobs have been fortunate over the last couple of years. We currently have the green Adam Clayton, purple Adam Clayton, the American Elite posted by @jd56hawk and the Noir P. Before that was the Opal J, 66 J and Hot Rod Red Jaguar. Not many at all considering how many models are currently in production.

On a side note, Surf Pearl looks much better in person. It has a subtle metallic hue to it that is super sharp.
I should've grabbed an Opal Jazz when I had the chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BIGEJ2
Like the price or not, the truth is Fender doesn’t frequently offer a matching headstock outside of its Custom Shop. Us matching headstock snobs have been fortunate over the last couple of years. We currently have the green Adam Clayton, purple Adam Clayton, the American Elite posted by @jd56hawk and the Noir P. Before that was the Opal J, 66 J and Hot Rod Red Jaguar. Not many at all considering how many models are currently in production.

On a side note, Surf Pearl looks much better in person. It has a subtle metallic hue to it that is super sharp.

Also the Troy Sanders Jaguar.

(I wouldn't normally add a comment for something so small normally, but I do love that bass).
 
  • Like
Reactions: BIGEJ2
How incredibly disappointing. :(
Musicians must be the cheapest consumers out there. Nobody blinks about a t.v. that costs 1k and might last 6yrs or an $800.00 phone that's obsolete in 3.
A $1200.00 bass will last at least 3 generations if it's even half-way looked after. Sure, they're simple devices but if you fancy playing bass you'll need one.
Compared to fishing, motorcycles, skiing or mtn. bikes playing bass is CHEAP. Real cheap.
You really, really want a Fender with a painted headstock? Pony up I guess or try your cheap luck at Alibaba......
Happy Holidays all....:)
Holy crap, what a great point. Never thought of it that way.
 
GImme, gimme, gimme, the problem with the world today, everyone expects something for nothing. Check out Musicman, I believe they charge $150 for a matching headstock.
When Yugo was selling cars they charged extra for coat hangers in the back seat. On one hand they were being cheap. On the other hand not everyone wanted coat hangers in the back seat.
 
Wow. Such angst. I guess the Christmas spirit has a shorter shelf life than the Christmas dinner. I never noticed the shortage of matching headstocks on Fenders. My natural P with a maple neck has a perfectly matched headstock. :smug: For those of you who insist on custom colors, what would happen if you decided to slap a new neck on your Daphne blue baby and the only one available had a Sherwood green headstock? Hmmm? The beauty of Fender basses is that they are utilitarian instruments that are designed to be almost indestructible, and easily reparable in the event of a catastrophe. Perhaps the notion of plain headstocks was to make the replacement necks a universal fit. I can't imagine an attractive version of sunburst on a headstock. The downside of this is that counterfeiters have less work to do. Slap on a decal and you're good to go.